Gregory of Nyssa's Engagement with Conceptual Metaphors: The Analogies of "Father," "Son," and "Begetting" in Against Eunomius
This essay explores what Gregory of Nyssa is doing when he claims in Against Eunomius that his use of the language of "father," "son" and "begetting" for the divine is supported by the "apprehension of ordinary people" and by the "judgement of nature.&quo...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Religion & theology
Année: 2019, Volume: 26, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 112-146 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Gregorius, Nyssenus 335-394, Contra Eunomium
/ Littérature chrétienne
/ Langage
/ Métaphore
/ Père
/ Fils
/ Conception
|
| RelBib Classification: | FA Théologie KAB Christianisme primitif KAD Haut Moyen Âge |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
conceptual metaphors
B divine Sonship of Christ B Eunomius B Gregory of Nyssa B development of Trinitarian doctrine |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This essay explores what Gregory of Nyssa is doing when he claims in Against Eunomius that his use of the language of "father," "son" and "begetting" for the divine is supported by the "apprehension of ordinary people" and by the "judgement of nature." It uses conceptual metaphor theory in order to show that while Gregory recognised the role of ordinary human language in comprehending the divine, and so engaged with normal conceptual mappings from the domain of kinship, he also sought to transform those mappings in order to transform peoples' thought processes and thus how they conceptualised the divine. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1574-3012 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion & theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15743012-02601007 |