Intersections Between the Architect's Cubit, the Science of Surveying, and Social Practices in CaʿFer Efendi's Seventeenth-Century Book on Ottoman Architecture

In 1614 Caʿfer Efendi devoted four chapters of his book on architecture to the science of surveying. Caʿfer's text is the only extant comprehensive book written by a scholar on the relation between architecture and various forms of knowledge. His sections on surveying have attracted little scho...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Kale, Gül (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill [2019]
Dans: Muqarnas
Année: 2019, Volume: 36, Numéro: 1, Pages: 131-177
Sujets non-standardisés:B early modern intellectual history
B Ethics
B judicial codes
B Ottoman Architecture
B science of surveying
B books on architecture
B architect's cubit
B social practices
B architectural theory
B history of measurement
B Ottoman scholar Caʿfer Efendi
B chief architect Mehmed Agha
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:In 1614 Caʿfer Efendi devoted four chapters of his book on architecture to the science of surveying. Caʿfer's text is the only extant comprehensive book written by a scholar on the relation between architecture and various forms of knowledge. His sections on surveying have attracted little scholarly attention since they were often viewed as ad hoc chapters in a biography of the chief architect Mehmed Agha. An investigation into the intersection between architecture, as represented by the architect's cubit, the science of surveying, and jurisprudence sheds significant light on how scholars assessed the legitimacy of early modern Ottoman architecture. In this article, I examine the relationship between architectural practices, mathematical knowledge, and social practices by focusing on Caʿfer Efendi's elaborations on the architect's cubit, units of measure, and mensuration of areas. These links need to be understood through the cultural and scientific context in which architects and scholars collaborated. I also explore Caʿfer Efendi's identity, which gave him the tools to discuss such intrinsic connections. When read along with court decrees, and in conjunction with the use of mathematical sciences for civic affairs, this investigation reveals how Ottoman architecture was embedded in the scientific discourses, social practices, and ethical concerns of the early seventeenth century.
ISSN:2211-8993
Contient:Enthalten in: Muqarnas
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 22118993-00361P07