Buddha as a God: An Empirical Assessment

For at least a century, scholars have argued about whether or not Buddha is considered a god. We treat this question empirically by conducting two ethnographic studies among residents of the Tyva Republic, one of the Buddhist republics in the Russian Federation. Using a mixed methods approach to int...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Purzycki, Benjamin Grant (Auteur) ; Holland, Edward C. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill [2019]
Dans: Method & theory in the study of religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 31, Numéro: 4/5, Pages: 347-375
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Tuwa / Buddhisme / Buddha 563 avant J.-C.-483 avant J.-C. / Divinisation / Anthropologie cognitive
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AD Sociologie des religions
BL Bouddhisme
KBK Europe de l'Est
Sujets non-standardisés:B Buddhism
B Gods
B Tyva Republic
B Ethnographic Methods
B Cognitive Anthropology
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:For at least a century, scholars have argued about whether or not Buddha is considered a god. We treat this question empirically by conducting two ethnographic studies among residents of the Tyva Republic, one of the Buddhist republics in the Russian Federation. Using a mixed methods approach to interrogate the question, this report concludes that Buddha is, in fact, popularly represented as a punitive and moralistic supernatural agent in the republic and demographic factors co-vary with such beliefs. The paper addresses longstanding concerns and situates the results in contemporary social scientific inquiry that addresses questions of when, where, to what degree, and why he is represented as a deity.
ISSN:1570-0682
Contient:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341453