What If?: An Experiment to Include a Religious Narrative in the Approach of the European Court of Human Rights

According to some interpretations of Islam supported by gender activists, the veil can be perceived as a passport that enables women to participate in public affairs. This argument has been overlooked by the courts, including the European Court of Human Rights. The latter has adopted a discourse tha...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Engeland, Anisseh van 1977- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill [2019]
Dans: Journal of law, religion and state
Année: 2019, Volume: 7, Numéro: 2, Pages: 213-241
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte / Musulmane / Voile / Vie sociale / Participation
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
BJ Islam
KBA Europe de l'Ouest
XA Droit
Sujets non-standardisés:B Islam
B Social Cohesion
B European Court of Human Rights
B Veil
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:According to some interpretations of Islam supported by gender activists, the veil can be perceived as a passport that enables women to participate in public affairs. This argument has been overlooked by the courts, including the European Court of Human Rights. The latter has adopted a discourse that considers the veil to be a threat to public order and gender equality, and more recently, an obstacle to social cohesion. By doing so, the Court has excluded veiled European Muslim women from the public sphere. The Court has justified curbing freedom of religion by granting states a wide margin of appreciation on the basis of the concept of "living together." I argue that the Court needs to take the "passport veil" into account to be consistent with its argument on living together. A shift of approach and discourse would constitute a new way of understanding integration through the veil.
ISSN:2212-4810
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of law, religion and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22124810-00702004