Martin Buber's View of Biblical Leadership and His View of the Eternal Thou
Recent studies have renewed focus on Martin Buber's "theopolitics" in contrast to "theological politics." The present study expands this work by looking at what Buber meant by God. His approach to the Bible, informed by his view that "extended, the lines of relationship...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
Année: 2019, Volume: 27, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-25 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Buber, Martin 1878-1965, Ich und Du
/ Bibel. Altes Testament (Biblia Hebraica)
/ Dieu
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion BH Judaïsme |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B Hebrew Bible B Leadership B Eternal Thou B Theopolitics B God B Martin Buber |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Recent studies have renewed focus on Martin Buber's "theopolitics" in contrast to "theological politics." The present study expands this work by looking at what Buber meant by God. His approach to the Bible, informed by his view that "extended, the lines of relationship meet in the Eternal Thou," illuminates his analysis of the five types of biblical leadership. That analysis, far from separating "religion" and "politics," seemed to assume what might be designated a civil religion. The social order was integrated with religious concerns. Underneath the socio-religious surface, however, Buber discerned universal principles of relationship. Analyzing each stage in biblical leadership as Buber presented it shows how he extended the lines of historical relationships to reveal an aspect of the Eternal Thou. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-285X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341236 |