Exploring Religious Intellectual Humility and Spiritual Humility
This article explored differences between religious intellectual humility (IH), which refers to openness to different religious views and perspectives, and spiritual humility (SH), which refers to humility before God or the Sacred. In Study 1, participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
2019
|
Dans: |
Journal of psychology and christianity
Année: 2019, Volume: 38, Numéro: 1, Pages: 22-34 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Humilité
/ Religion
/ Dialogue interreligieux
/ Fondamentalisme
/ Position politique
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions AG Vie religieuse AX Dialogue interreligieux CB Spiritualité chrétienne CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses CG Christianisme et politique |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Humility
B BELIEF & doubt B Spiritual Life B Religious Identity B Religious Fundamentalism B RELIGIOUS differences |
Résumé: | This article explored differences between religious intellectual humility (IH), which refers to openness to different religious views and perspectives, and spiritual humility (SH), which refers to humility before God or the Sacred. In Study 1, participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and several religious variables. Overall, religious IH was a positive predictor of openness to religious differences and questioning of religious beliefs, whereas SH was a positive predictor of religious fundamentalism and viewing religion as an end in itself. In Study 2, a second sample of participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and moral foundations (Graham et al., 2011). Religious IH was a positive predictor of the moral foundations that are more consistent with liberal political values, whereas SH was a positive predictor of the moral foundations that are consistent with more conservative political values (Graham et al., 2009). We conclude by discussing limitations and suggestions for future research exploring humility and religion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0733-4273 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and christianity
|