Exploring Religious Intellectual Humility and Spiritual Humility

This article explored differences between religious intellectual humility (IH), which refers to openness to different religious views and perspectives, and spiritual humility (SH), which refers to humility before God or the Sacred. In Study 1, participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Hodge, Adam S. ca. 20./21. Jh. (Auteur)
Type de support: Imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: 2019
Dans: Journal of psychology and christianity
Année: 2019, Volume: 38, Numéro: 1, Pages: 22-34
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Humilité / Religion / Dialogue interreligieux / Fondamentalisme / Position politique
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
AG Vie religieuse
AX Dialogue interreligieux
CB Spiritualité chrétienne
CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses
CG Christianisme et politique
Sujets non-standardisés:B Humility
B BELIEF & doubt
B Spiritual Life
B Religious Identity
B Religious Fundamentalism
B RELIGIOUS differences
Description
Résumé:This article explored differences between religious intellectual humility (IH), which refers to openness to different religious views and perspectives, and spiritual humility (SH), which refers to humility before God or the Sacred. In Study 1, participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and several religious variables. Overall, religious IH was a positive predictor of openness to religious differences and questioning of religious beliefs, whereas SH was a positive predictor of religious fundamentalism and viewing religion as an end in itself. In Study 2, a second sample of participants completed measures of religious IH, SH, and moral foundations (Graham et al., 2011). Religious IH was a positive predictor of the moral foundations that are more consistent with liberal political values, whereas SH was a positive predictor of the moral foundations that are consistent with more conservative political values (Graham et al., 2009). We conclude by discussing limitations and suggestions for future research exploring humility and religion.
ISSN:0733-4273
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and christianity