Folk Etymology in the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic Dialects
Although folk etymology is a common linguistic phenomenon, it has hitherto hardly been touched upon in lexicological and other works related to varieties of Neo-Aramaic. The present article concerns twelve cases of folk etymology selected from some of the dialects of North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA)...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
[2018]
|
Dans: |
Aramaic studies
Année: 2018, Volume: 16, Numéro: 2, Pages: 215-233 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Araméen
/ Neo (langue construite)
/ Étymologie populaire
|
RelBib Classification: | BH Judaïsme |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
folk-etymological alteration
B folk etymology B folk-etymological interpretation B lexical cognates B NENA |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | Although folk etymology is a common linguistic phenomenon, it has hitherto hardly been touched upon in lexicological and other works related to varieties of Neo-Aramaic. The present article concerns twelve cases of folk etymology selected from some of the dialects of North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA), the largest and most variegated division of modern Aramaic. Among these are three folk-etymological interpretations that did not induce structural or other changes, as well as nine cases of folk-etymological processes that reshaped NENA lexical items. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5227 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Aramaic studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455227-01602007 |