Folk Etymology in the North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic Dialects
Although folk etymology is a common linguistic phenomenon, it has hitherto hardly been touched upon in lexicological and other works related to varieties of Neo-Aramaic. The present article concerns twelve cases of folk etymology selected from some of the dialects of North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA)...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
[2018]
|
| In: |
Aramaic studies
Jahr: 2018, Band: 16, Heft: 2, Seiten: 215-233 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Aramäisch
/ Neo
/ Volksetymologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | BH Judentum |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
folk-etymological alteration
B folk etymology B folk-etymological interpretation B lexical cognates B NENA |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Although folk etymology is a common linguistic phenomenon, it has hitherto hardly been touched upon in lexicological and other works related to varieties of Neo-Aramaic. The present article concerns twelve cases of folk etymology selected from some of the dialects of North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA), the largest and most variegated division of modern Aramaic. Among these are three folk-etymological interpretations that did not induce structural or other changes, as well as nine cases of folk-etymological processes that reshaped NENA lexical items. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5227 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Aramaic studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455227-01602007 |