Anthropomorphism, Theatre, Epiphany: From Herodotus to Hellenistic Historians

This paper argues that, beginning with the Euripidean deus ex machina, dramatic festivals introduced a new standard into epiphanic rituals and experience. Through the scenic double énonciation, gods are seen by mythical heroes as gods, but by the Athenian spectators as costumed actors and fictive en...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Koch, Piettre Renée (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: De Gruyter [2018]
Dans: Archiv für Religionsgeschichte
Année: 2018, Volume: 20, Numéro: 1, Pages: 189-209
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Herodotus ca. 485 v. Chr.-424 v. Chr. / Euripides ca. 485/480 v. Chr.-406 v.Chr. / Deus ex machina / Épiphanie / Rite / Héros / Dieu / Anthropomorphisme / Hellénisme / Historiographie
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AG Vie religieuse
BE Religion gréco-romaine
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:This paper argues that, beginning with the Euripidean deus ex machina, dramatic festivals introduced a new standard into epiphanic rituals and experience. Through the scenic double énonciation, gods are seen by mythical heroes as gods, but by the Athenian spectators as costumed actors and fictive entities. People could scarcely believe these were ‘real' gods, but would have no doubt been impressed by the scenic machinery. Thus the Homeric theme of a hero's likeness to the gods developed into the Hellenistic theme of the godlike ruler's (or actor's) theatrical success (or deceit). So in the Athenians' Hymn to Demetrius Poliorcetes, a victorious ruler entering a city is welcomed as a better god than the gods themselves. The simultaneous rise in popularity of paradoxical stories and experiences in the Hellenistic period was grounded not in believing, but in disbelieving - a phenomenon associated with antiquarian interests, the self-publicity of religious sanctuaries, or amazed credulity. People were increasingly drawn to ‘real' gods, leading to long pilgrimages and extensive financial outlay (in the mysteries) in order to see them. I investigate this phenomenon by focusing upon fragments of the ‘mimetic' or ‘tragic' Greek historians that survive from this period.
ISSN:1868-8888
Contient:Enthalten in: Archiv für Religionsgeschichte
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/arege-2018-0012