Go in Peace: Brain Death, Reasonable Accommodation and Jewish Mourning Rituals

Religious objections to brain death are common among Orthodox Jews. These objections often lead to conflicts between families of patients who are diagnosed with brain death, and physicians and hospitals. Israel, New York and New Jersey (among other jurisdictions) include accommodation clauses in the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Gabbay, Ezra (Author) ; Fins, Joseph J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V. [2019]
In: Journal of religion and health
Year: 2019, Volume: 58, Issue: 5, Pages: 1672-1686
Further subjects:B Brain Death
B reasonable accommodation
B Judaism
B Mourning
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1681198703
003 DE-627
005 20191106152359.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191106s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10943-019-00874-y  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1681198703 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1681198703 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gabbay, Ezra  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Go in Peace  |b Brain Death, Reasonable Accommodation and Jewish Mourning Rituals  |c Ezra Gabbay 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Religious objections to brain death are common among Orthodox Jews. These objections often lead to conflicts between families of patients who are diagnosed with brain death, and physicians and hospitals. Israel, New York and New Jersey (among other jurisdictions) include accommodation clauses in their regulations or laws regarding the determination of death by brain-death criteria. The purpose of these clauses is to allow families an opportunity to oppose or even veto (in the case of Israel and New Jersey) determinations of brain death. In New York, the extent and duration of this accommodation period are generally left to the discretion of individual institutions. Jewish tradition has embraced cultural and psychological mechanisms to help families cope with death and loss through a structured process that includes quick separation from the physical body of the dead and a gradual transition through phases of mourning (Aninut,Kriah, timely burial, Shiva, Shloshim, first year of mourning). This process is meant to help achieve closure, acceptance, support for the bereaved, commemoration, faith in the afterlife and affirmation of life for the survivors. We argue that the open-ended period of contention of brain death under the reasonable accommodation laws may undermine the deep psychological wisdom that informs the Jewish tradition. By promoting dispute and conflict, the process of inevitable separation and acceptance is delayed and the comforting rituals of mourning are deferred at the expense of the bereft family. Solutions to this problem may include separating discussions of organ donation from those concerning the diagnosis of brain death per se, allowing a period of no escalation of life-sustaining interventions rather than unilateral withdrawal of mechanical ventilation, engagement of rabbinical leaders in individual cases and policy formulations that prioritize emotional support for families. 
650 4 |a Brain Death 
650 4 |a Judaism 
650 4 |a Mourning 
650 4 |a reasonable accommodation 
700 1 |a Fins, Joseph J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religion and health  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1961  |g 58(2019), 5, Seite 1672-1686  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320578089  |w (DE-600)2017250-3  |w (DE-576)121466191  |x 1573-6571  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:58  |g year:2019  |g number:5  |g pages:1672-1686 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10943-019-00874-y.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00874-y  |x Resolving-System 
936 u w |d 58  |j 2019  |e 5  |h 1672-1686 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3538151741 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1681198703 
LOK |0 005 20191106155554 
LOK |0 008 191106||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL