Rights Against High-Level Risk Impositions
In this article, I argue for a distinct and novel right-based account of risks and I call it the Sophisticated High-risk Thesis. I argue that there is a distinction between rights-infringing risk impositions and no-rights-infringing risk impositions. An action imposing a high risk of harm infringes...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2019]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2019, Volume: 22, Issue: 3, Pages: 763-778 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethics VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Right-based account of risk
B Disaster prevention B Risk thesis B Consent B Reciprocity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1680887092 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20191104113717.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191104s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-019-09994-6 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1680887092 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1680887092 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Song, Fei |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rights Against High-Level Risk Impositions |c Fei Song |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article, I argue for a distinct and novel right-based account of risks and I call it the Sophisticated High-risk Thesis. I argue that there is a distinction between rights-infringing risk impositions and no-rights-infringing risk impositions. An action imposing a high risk of harm infringes rights, whereas an act imposing a low risk of harm does not. I also suggest three principles that govern the permissibility of highly risky actions. If a highly risky action meets the conditions specified by any of these three principles, it can be justified. These principles are the consent principle*, the prevent disaster principle* and the reciprocity principle**. I show that the Sophisticated High-risk Thesis is, in general, better than the alternative Risk Thesis defended by McCarthy. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Consent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Disaster prevention | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reciprocity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Right-based account of risk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk thesis | |
| 652 | |a NCA:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 22(2019), 3, Seite 763-778 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g pages:763-778 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-09994-6 |x Resolving-System |
| 936 | u | w | |d 22 |j 2019 |e 3 |h 763-778 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3536592864 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1680887092 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191112155507 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 191104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||