Why Is Sunday Morning the Most Segregated Hour? A Sociopsychological Inquiry into the Barriers and Opportunities for Ecumenical Unity

The segregation between faith communities is better explained by exploring the socio-cultural frameworks with which people identify because of their value orientations than by reference to doctrinal disagreements. In most faith communities, not only do such values as charity or justice count, but al...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Willigenburg, Theo van 1960- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: University of Pennsylvania Press 2019
Dans: Journal of ecumenical studies
Année: 2019, Volume: 54, Numéro: 2, Pages: 210-228
RelBib Classification:CD Christianisme et culture
KDJ Œcuménisme
ZA Sciences sociales
Sujets non-standardisés:B Ethnicity
B sociocultural identities
B Moral Foundations Theory
B SOCIOCULTURAL factors
B Sacredness
B sociopsychological mechanisms fostering unity
B ecumenical disunity
B MANNERS & customs
B Ecumenical Movement
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The segregation between faith communities is better explained by exploring the socio-cultural frameworks with which people identify because of their value orientations than by reference to doctrinal disagreements. In most faith communities, not only do such values as charity or justice count, but also important are the sacredness and authority of traditions, people, and places, as well as ethnic recognizability and loyalty to the ingroup. These latter normative orientations explain why it is so difficult for faith communities to engage in ecumenical processes of unification. Given this, the essay explores two sociopsychologically viable ways in which ecumenical unity may be fostered.
ISSN:2162-3937
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of ecumenical studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/ecu.2019.0009