In Defense of Publics: Projection, Bias, and Cultural Narratives in Science and Religion Debates

John H. Evans's recent book Morals Not Knowledge is a timely argument to recognize broader social and cultural factors that might impact what U.S. religious publics think about the relationship between science and religion and their attitudes toward science and/or religion. While Evans's f...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:JOHN EVANS'S MORALS NOT KNOWLEDGE
Main Author: Elsdon-Baker, Fern (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Open Library of Humanities$s2024- [2019]
In: Zygon
Year: 2019, Volume: 54, Issue: 3, Pages: 618-633
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Evans, John Hyde 1965-, Morals not knowledge / Natural sciences / Religion / Debate
Further subjects:B public perceptions of science
B science and religion in society
B evolutionary science
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1671778790
003 DE-627
005 20240409124718.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190821s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12548  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1671778790 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1671778790 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1193153867  |0 (DE-627)1671787862  |4 aut  |a Elsdon-Baker, Fern 
109 |a Elsdon-Baker, Fern  |a Baker, Fern Elsdon- 
245 1 0 |a In Defense of Publics  |b Projection, Bias, and Cultural Narratives in Science and Religion Debates  |c Fern Elsdon-Baker 
246 1 |i Rubrikentitel  |a JOHN EVANS'S MORALS NOT KNOWLEDGE 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a John H. Evans's recent book Morals Not Knowledge is a timely argument to recognize broader social and cultural factors that might impact what U.S. religious publics think about the relationship between science and religion and their attitudes toward science and/or religion. While Evans's focus is primarily on what can be classed as moral issues, this response argues that there are other factors that sit within neither the older epistemic conflict model approach nor a moral conflict model approach that also merit further investigation. There is a significant need for further research that examines the social, psychological, (geo)political, and broader cultural factors shaping people's social identities in relation to science and religion debates. When undertaking such research, we need to be wary of creating a binary between scholarly and public space discourse. Social scientific research in this field should be led by public perceptions, attitudes, and views, not by concepts or frameworks that we project onto them. 
650 4 |a evolutionary science 
650 4 |a public perceptions of science 
650 4 |a science and religion in society 
689 0 0 |d u  |0 (DE-588)1202950310  |0 (DE-627)1687551839  |0 (DE-576)186779488  |a Evans, John Hyde  |2 gnd  |d 1965-  |t Morals not knowledge 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4041421-8  |0 (DE-627)106219324  |0 (DE-576)209044837  |2 gnd  |a Naturwissenschaften 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049396-9  |0 (DE-627)106187155  |0 (DE-576)209081880  |2 gnd  |a Religion 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4148952-4  |0 (DE-627)105564931  |0 (DE-576)20976869X  |2 gnd  |a Debatte 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d [London] : Open Library of Humanities$s2024-, 1966  |g 54(2019), 3, Seite 618-633  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:54  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g pages:618-633 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12548  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12548  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3507929708 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1671778790 
LOK |0 005 20190821150210 
LOK |0 008 190821||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Debate,Natural sciences,Natural sciences,Natural science,Science in literature,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion 
STB 0 0 |a Débat,Religion,Religions,Religion,Sciences de la nature,Sciences de la nature,Sciences,Sciences,Sciences (motif),Sciences 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencias naturales,Ciencias naturales,Debate,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Dibattito,Religione,Religione,Religione,Scienze naturali,Scienze naturali 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,自然科学,自然科学,辨论,争论 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,自然科學,自然科學,辨論,爭論 
STG 0 0 |a Ciências naturais,Ciências naturais,Debate,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Дебаты,Естественные науки (мотив),Естественные науки,Религия,Религия (мотив) 
STI 0 0 |a Δημόσια συζήτηση,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Φυσικές επιστήμες (μοτίβο),Φυσικές επιστήμες 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Naturforschung,Naturlehre,Naturwissenschaft,Naturforschung,Naturlehre,Naturwissenschaft , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Debattieren