Theoretical, Terminological, and Taxonomic Trouble in the Academic Study of Contemporary Paganism: A Case for Reform
As the academic study of contemporary Paganism approaches its fourth decade, it faces a variety of theoretical, methodological, and terminological challenges, some of which have faced little or no exploration to date. Here, an attempt to tackle some of the most significant will be made. First, I wil...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox Publ.
[2016]
|
In: |
The pomegranate
Year: 2016, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 31-59 |
Further subjects: | B
Terminology
B Pagan Studies B Paganism B Contemporary Paganism B Neo-paganism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1670475395 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230425145603.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 190801s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/pome.v18i1.28457 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1670475395 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1670475395 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1081304618 |0 (DE-627)845802046 |0 (DE-576)454104642 |4 aut |a White, Ethan Doyle | |
109 | |a White, Ethan Doyle |a Doyle White, Ethan | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Theoretical, Terminological, and Taxonomic Trouble in the Academic Study of Contemporary Paganism |b A Case for Reform |c Ethan Doyle White |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a As the academic study of contemporary Paganism approaches its fourth decade, it faces a variety of theoretical, methodological, and terminological challenges, some of which have faced little or no exploration to date. Here, an attempt to tackle some of the most significant will be made. First, I will examine both how academics and practicing Pagans have defined "contemporary Paganism," criticizing many such definitions and arguing for the scholarly adoption of a classificatory approach rooted in Wittgenstein's "family resemblance" paradigm. Second, I shall argue for the need of a much clearer definition of what "Pagan studies" actually studies, before challenging the utility of the term "Pagan studies" itself for being too closely associated with Pagan community activism. Third, I present my argument as to why our field is in such dire need of serious reform in order to establish much needed academic respectability. | ||
601 | |a Terminologie | ||
601 | |a Taxonomie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Contemporary Paganism | |
650 | 4 | |a Neo-paganism | |
650 | 4 | |a Pagan Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Paganism | |
650 | 4 | |a Terminology | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The pomegranate |d London : Equinox Publ., 1997 |g 18(2016), 1, Seite 31-59 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)481280014 |w (DE-600)2180168-X |w (DE-576)33926134X |x 1743-1735 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:31-59 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journals.equinoxpub.com/POM/article/view/28457 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/pome.v18i1.28457 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 18 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 31-59 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3502561702 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1670475395 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20190801165959 | ||
LOK | |0 008 190801||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |