Risk Preference Theory and Gender Differences in Religiousness: A Replication and Extension
Almost 25 years ago, Miller and Hoffmann developed a theory of risk preferences as a way to account for gender differences in religiousness. Although several subsequent studies have purportedly examined the theory, there has been no genuine replication of their empirical analysis. This study provide...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 58, Numéro: 1, Pages: 210-230 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Acceptation du risque
/ Différences de genre
/ Religiosité
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions AG Vie religieuse CB Spiritualité chrétienne KBQ Amérique du Nord |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Gender differences
B Religiousness B risk preferences |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Almost 25 years ago, Miller and Hoffmann developed a theory of risk preferences as a way to account for gender differences in religiousness. Although several subsequent studies have purportedly examined the theory, there has been no genuine replication of their empirical analysis. This study provides a replication and extension using three nationally representative samples of adolescents in the United States: the 2015 Monitoring the Future (n = 2,292) study, the 2010 National Survey of Drug Use and Health (n = 18,394), and the 2005 National Survey of Youth and Religion (n = 2,059). The results provide modest support for risk preference theory: the introduction of risk preferences diminishes the female-male difference in religiousness among youth in all three data sets. However, there is also evidence that risk behaviors and religious affiliation may be more important than risk preferences in accounting for gender differences in religiousness. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-5906 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12578 |