A Research Note on Interfaith Marriage Statistics
The distance from a purely quantitative statement of a statistical pattern to a sociological interpretation of that pattern is often quite great. Several steps are sometimes needed to cover that distance. With regard to the interpretation of interfaith marriage statistics, a third refinement is sugg...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[1968]
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Année: 1968, Volume: 7, Numéro: 1, Pages: 97-103 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Mathematical procedures
B Ratios B Intermarriage B Divorce rates B Judaism B Census Data B Protestantism B Catholicism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1667793179 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190621165834.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190621s1968 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2307/1385114 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1667793179 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1667793179 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)126791651 |0 (DE-627)372604706 |0 (DE-576)163641560 |4 aut |a Yinger, John Milton |d 1916-2011 | |
| 109 | |a Yinger, John Milton 1916-2011 |a Yingge 1916-2011 |a Yinger, John M. 1916-2011 |a Yinger, J. Milton 1916-2011 |a Yingge, J. M. 1916-2011 |a Ying ge, J. M. 1916-2011 |a Ying ge 1916-2011 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Research Note on Interfaith Marriage Statistics |c J. Milton Yinger |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1968] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The distance from a purely quantitative statement of a statistical pattern to a sociological interpretation of that pattern is often quite great. Several steps are sometimes needed to cover that distance. With regard to the interpretation of interfaith marriage statistics, a third refinement is suggested here to add to two previously developed refinements. These should be seen as steps toward greater reliability of measurement; but they still leave us with a definition of intermarriage that fails to take the full range of personality and structural aspects into account. A thorough revision of our conceptions of interfaith marriage is called for. | ||
| 601 | |a Statistik | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Catholicism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Census Data | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Divorce rates | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intermarriage | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judaism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mathematical procedures | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Protestantism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ratios | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the scientific study of religion |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1961 |g 7(1968), 1, Seite 97-103 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320634809 |w (DE-600)2024375-3 |w (DE-576)093888538 |x 1468-5906 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:1968 |g number:1 |g pages:97-103 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/1385114 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.2307/1385114 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 7 |j 1968 |e 1 |h 97-103 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 348929632X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1667793179 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190621165834 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190621||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||