THE JUDGMENT OF PONTIUS PILATE: A CRITIQUE OF GIORGIO AGAMBEN

In Pilate and Jesus, Giorgio Agamben argues that Pontius Pilate never formally condemned Jesus of Nazareth. "The traditional interpretation of Jesus' trial . must be revised," he urges, because "there has not been any judgment in a technical sense." In Agamben's telling...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dusenbury, D. L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2017]
In: Journal of law and religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 32, Issue: 2, Pages: 340-365
Further subjects:B Hugo Grotius
B Jesus of Nazareth
B Giorgio Agamben
B Roman Law
B Pontius Pilate
B Lactantius
B Political Theology
B New Testament
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1666372226
003 DE-627
005 20190528083438.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190528s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/jlr.2017.35  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1666372226 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1666372226 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dusenbury, D. L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a THE JUDGMENT OF PONTIUS PILATE  |b A CRITIQUE OF GIORGIO AGAMBEN  |c D. L. Dusenbury 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In Pilate and Jesus, Giorgio Agamben argues that Pontius Pilate never formally condemned Jesus of Nazareth. "The traditional interpretation of Jesus' trial . must be revised," he urges, because "there has not been any judgment in a technical sense." In Agamben's telling, Pilate's non-judgment is the original truth of Jesus's death that has been covered over by tradition. This is an intriguing hypothesis, but Agamben's use of sources in arguing it is highly irregular. This article offers a critique of the legal and philological argumentation of Pilate and Jesus. In the process, it revisits an ancient-and still actual-controversy surrounding the Roman trial of Jesus and demonstrates that Pilate did sentence Jesus, pro tribunali, to death on a cross. 
601 |a Agamben, Giorgio 
650 4 |a Giorgio Agamben 
650 4 |a Hugo Grotius 
650 4 |a Jesus of Nazareth 
650 4 |a Lactantius 
650 4 |a New Testament 
650 4 |a Pontius Pilate 
650 4 |a Roman Law 
650 4 |a Political Theology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of law and religion  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983  |g 32(2017), 2, Seite 340-365  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)461908581  |w (DE-600)2164472-X  |w (DE-576)273875132  |x 2163-3088  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2017  |g number:2  |g pages:340-365 
856 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/213B4E09DF4DB1367A1D62E14A235339/S0748081417000352a.pdf/div-class-title-the-judgment-of-pontius-pilate-a-critique-of-giorgio-agamben-div.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/judgment-of-pontius-pilate-a-critique-of-giorgio-agamben/213B4E09DF4DB1367A1D62E14A235339  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2017.35  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 32  |j 2017  |e 2  |h 340-365 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3479870384 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1666372226 
LOK |0 005 20190528083438 
LOK |0 008 190528||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL