Intercultural Theology and the Historicity of Thinking: Reconstructing the Current German Discussion in Philosophical Perspective
In this article, I analyze the German-speaking discussion on the discipline of Intercultural Theology. Among others, I criticize Schmidt-Leukel's suggestion to define it as interreligious theology. This definition being somewhat arbitrary, I suggest reconstructing it under the parameters of phi...
| Publié dans: | Interreligious studies and intercultural theology |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Equinox Publishing Ltd
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Interreligious studies and intercultural theology
|
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Christian Other
B Neo-Kantianism B Historicity B Feldtkeller B ethnocentricity B transmission-centered approach B Ustorf B Schmidt-Leukel B Küster |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In this article, I analyze the German-speaking discussion on the discipline of Intercultural Theology. Among others, I criticize Schmidt-Leukel's suggestion to define it as interreligious theology. This definition being somewhat arbitrary, I suggest reconstructing it under the parameters of philosophical and cultural insights that acknowledge the historicity of thinking and the ethnocentricity of justification. This move allows to allows "transmission-centered approaches" to be replaced by "context-sensitive" ones that honor the subject status of the Christian Other. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2397-348X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Interreligious studies and intercultural theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/isit.31380 |