Frog in a Pot: American Atheism and the Thermometry of Supreme Court Ideology

Since the 1940s, atheists have played an essential role in re-defining American religion. They have been directly responsible for abolishing sectarian religious education from American public schools. For removing prayer from public schools. For restricting the use of belief affirmations by American...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Quillen, Ethan (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Equinox [2019]
In: Implicit religion
Jahr: 2018, Band: 21, Heft: 3, Seiten: 301-337
weitere Schlagwörter:B United States Supreme Court
B American Studies
B Donald Trump
B Religious Studies
B First Amendment
B American Atheism
B Religion And Politics
Online Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1666106305
003 DE-627
005 20230831092323.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190522s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1558/imre.37956  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1666106305 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1666106305 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Quillen, Ethan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Frog in a Pot  |b American Atheism and the Thermometry of Supreme Court Ideology  |c Ethan Quillen 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Since the 1940s, atheists have played an essential role in re-defining American religion. They have been directly responsible for abolishing sectarian religious education from American public schools. For removing prayer from public schools. For restricting the use of belief affirmations by Americans elected or appointed to federal office. For amending the federal government's definition of "religious training and belief " so that they too might excuse themselves from military service. They have also challenged the theological language of the Pledge of Allegiance, federal funding for faith-based social service programs, and prayer invocations at official legislative meetings. And even on their own, these seven examples tell an exceptional story about American Atheism. But they tell another one as well. Across the sixty-six years in which they were considered by the United States Supreme Court, the Court itself underwent an ideological turn. From "equal justice under law," to justice according to political principles. And from enforcing the separation of church and state, to defending religious establishments in the name of "tradition." By using the first to gauge the progress of the second, this article will tell these two stories. 
601 |a Atheismus 
601 |a Ideologie 
650 4 |a American Atheism 
650 4 |a American Studies 
650 4 |a Donald Trump 
650 4 |a First Amendment 
650 4 |a Religion And Politics 
650 4 |a Religious Studies 
650 4 |a United States Supreme Court 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Implicit religion  |d Sheffield : Equinox, 2004  |g 21(2018), 3, Seite 301-337  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)481278389  |w (DE-600)2179936-2  |w (DE-576)256442428  |x 1743-1697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2018  |g number:3  |g pages:301-337 
856 4 0 |u https://journals.equinoxpub.com/IR/article/view/37956  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.37956  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 21  |j 2018  |e 3  |h 301-337 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3478823226 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1666106305 
LOK |0 005 20190522120415 
LOK |0 008 190522||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL