Identifying an Empirically-Derived 10-item Religiousness Measure from Lipsmeyer's Personal Religious Inventory: Psychometric Properties of the PRI-10
Although it is used throughout social scientific research and is psychometrically robust, Lipsmeyer's (1984) 45-item Personal Religious Inventory (PRI) is notably lengthy and may be less suitable than other more compendious measures of religiousness. The present study sought to identify, descri...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Springer Science Business Media B. V.
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Pastoral psychology
Année: 2019, Volume: 68, Numéro: 3, Pages: 271-284 |
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AE Psychologie de la religion ZD Psychologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Religion and mental health
B Psychometric Properties B emerging adults B measurement of religion |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | Although it is used throughout social scientific research and is psychometrically robust, Lipsmeyer's (1984) 45-item Personal Religious Inventory (PRI) is notably lengthy and may be less suitable than other more compendious measures of religiousness. The present study sought to identify, describe, and validate a brief yet comprehensive measure of religiousness derived from the PRI. Nine hundred twenty-one university students (M age = 19.24) participated online. Through parallel analyses and exploratory factor analyses, the authors developed a 10-item, four-factor scale (the PRI-10) that measures aspects of Religious Integration; Religious and Social Morality; Nonritual Social Religious Activity; and; Ritual Attendance. Excellent internal validity was identified for the PRI-10 through confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = .991; RMSEA = .041), and robust convergent validity emerged from moderate to strong correlations with well-validated measures of religiousness and spirituality. Divergent validity emerged from nonsignificant and negligible correlations with participants' age and grade point average. Further, individuals who reported low religiousness on the PRI-10 tended to have higher levels of psychological distress and need for treatment on the Langner Symptom Survey. Moreover, women who reported low levels of religiousness tended to report psychological distress above a clinically validated cutoff score denoting distress and need for treatment. The authors discuss the benefits and limitations of the novel measure, propose future psychometric validation, and suggest ways other researchers might utilize it. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-6679 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Pastoral psychology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11089-018-0852-y |