Religion, state and 'sovereign democracy' in Putin's Russia
This article explores the role of the dominant Russian Orthodox Church in the evolution of the post-communist Russian Federation. This is not a classic case where religion may have contributed to the democratisation of society because this has not been a primary goal of political elites, and the reg...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of religious and political practice
Année: 2016, Volume: 2, Numéro: 2, Pages: 249-266 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Democracy
B Religion B Putin B Orthodoxy B Russia |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | This article explores the role of the dominant Russian Orthodox Church in the evolution of the post-communist Russian Federation. This is not a classic case where religion may have contributed to the democratisation of society because this has not been a primary goal of political elites, and the regime that has emerged might best be described as 'hybrid' with growing authoritarian tendencies. Having played little role in the ending of communism, having little historical experience of working within a democracy, suspicious of liberal-individualist visions of public life and committed to a vision of its role as the hegemonic religious institution, the promotion of democratic governance has not been a priority of church leaders. At the same time the political structures created by the Kremlin encourage a degree of conformity and support for the regime by key social actors, and in the wake of the political crisis of 2011-2012 there have been further incentives for church and state to work more closely together. For the state, the church offers indirectly a constituency of political support; for the church, a more needy state has been prepared to promote at least part of its socially conservative agenda. In this context, neither is much concerned about democratic governance. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2056-6107 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious and political practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/20566093.2016.1181360 |