Morality and mortality: why the Church of England would have rejected Walzer's supreme emergency argument

Walzer insists that his supreme emergency argument morally legitimises Churchill's 1940 decision to bomb German civilians. We contend, however, that it is morally deficient. We contend, further, that if Walzer's argument had been presented to the leaders of the Church of England in 1940 as...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Journal of beliefs and values
Auteurs: Schawarz, Michael (Auteur) ; Comer, Debra R. 1960- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge [2018]
Dans: Journal of beliefs and values
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Walzer, Michael 1935- / Church of England / Éthique chrétienne / Éthique / Laïcité
RelBib Classification:KDE Église anglicane
NCC Éthique sociale
Sujets non-standardisés:B Ethics
B Rights
B Walzer
B Church of England
B supreme emergency
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:Walzer insists that his supreme emergency argument morally legitimises Churchill's 1940 decision to bomb German civilians. We contend, however, that it is morally deficient. We contend, further, that if Walzer's argument had been presented to the leaders of the Church of England in 1940 as justification for the bombing of German civilians, the Church leadership would have rejected it. According to Walzer, a supreme emergency forces us to waive rights we would honour under ordinary circumstances. But the Church has a different conception of rights. Because the Church is committed to universal rights - which are inviolable and cannot be overridden - it would never have agreed with Walzer. Our discussion as to those conflicting conceptions of rights illustrates what differentiates biblical ethics from secular ethics.
ISSN:1469-9362
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of beliefs and values
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2018.1441350