Recent studies on the ancient Indian vrātya

That the ancient Indian vrātya continues to engage scholars, and rightly so, is demonstrated by two recent publications, both with Tiziana Pontillo (Cagliari University) as one of the editors. The first one is "The Volatile World of Sovereignty: The Vrātya Problem and Kingship in South Asia&quo...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Edholm, Kristoffer af (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique | Livre Review
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: [Heidelberg Berlin] [publisher not identified] 2017
Dans: Electronic journal of Vedic studies (volume 24, issue 1)
Année: 2017
Collection/Revue:Electronic journal of Vedic studies volume 24, issue 1
Sujets non-standardisés:B Compte-rendu de lecture
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:That the ancient Indian vrātya continues to engage scholars, and rightly so, is demonstrated by two recent publications, both with Tiziana Pontillo (Cagliari University) as one of the editors. The first one is "The Volatile World of Sovereignty: The Vrātya Problem and Kingship in South Asia" (2015), the result of a three-year research project financed by the Regione Autonoma della Sardegna and coordinated by Pontillo. This book contains nineteen articles relating to the vrātya and Indian kingship. It approaches these subjects from a broad, interdisciplinary perspective, using a wide range of texts and some visual art. The second book, "Vrātya Culture in Vedic Sources" (2016), contains nine scholarly papers presented at the 16th World Sanskrit Conference in Bangkok 2015. In this volume the authors try to “single out the specific features of the assumed vrātya culture, i.e. those facets which are not included in the core of the orthodox Śrauta culture … or which seem to intentionally be shown in a bad light” (2016:6). We have comparatively little material dealing directly with the vrātya; one of the aims of both volumes in question is to add to the list of sources Vedic passages not previously analysed from the vrātya point of view (2015:3; 2016:1-2). It is my intention to review the two volumes in context of previous reseach and to discuss a handful of the contributions. I will also mention a number of vrātya-related articles published elsewhere.
Description:Review article
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.11588/ejvs.2017.1.2316
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-ejvs-23160