|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000caa a22000002 4500 |
| 001 |
1650583532 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20211207083731.0 |
| 007 |
tu |
| 008 |
190311s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1650583532
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-576)519814274
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)BSZ519814274
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Graham, Tyler
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The Danger of Durkheim: Ambiguity in the Theory of Social Effervescence
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2007
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a 2007 The Danger of Durkheim: Ambiguity in the Theory of Social Effervescence http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WWN-4NR6468-2/2/8354685cabdebf336190472598734eb1. - Graham, Tyler
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i In
|a Religion
|g 37(2007), 1, Seite 26-38
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:37
|g year:2007
|g number:1
|g pages:26-38
|
| 776 |
|
|
|i Erscheint auch als
|n elektronische Ausgabe
|w (DE-627)1646346246
|k Electronic
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a GIRA
|
| 936 |
u |
w |
|d 37
|j 2007
|e 1
|h 26-38
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| ELC |
|
|
|b 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 3337458858
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1650583532
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20190311224144
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 190311||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-Tue135-1)226543
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-Tue135-1
|c DE-627
|d DE-Tue135-1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-Tue135-1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|c 267
|m p
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a iZSA
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 936ln
|a JOUR
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 938
|k p
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 938
|l The purpose of this article is to shed light on an ambiguity in Emile Durkheim's theory of social effervescence. Durkheim's failure to distinguish two kinds of effervescence at the heart of the religious rite has left a dangerous legacy in the study of religion. If his work is read, however, in light of Rene Girard's theory of the violent origins of religion, his analysis of la societe can retain the distinction between the effervescence of the crowd in scapegoating and the effervescence of protecting the victims of scapegoating. This thesis is tested by briefly comparing some contemporary essays on Durkheim.
|8 0
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 938
|l File
|8 0
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw
|
| REL |
|
|
|a 1
|
| SUB |
|
|
|a REL
|