The role of the Tanya Nami Hakhi Baraita
The technical term תניא נמי הכי is used in the Babylonian Talmud to introduce a baraita that follows a memra. The similar and oftentimes identical language of the memra and baraita raises the question: If there was an extant baraita, why did the amora not quote it? Traditional responses and most mod...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
College
2002
|
| Dans: |
Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
Année: 2002, Volume: 73, Pages: 133-156 |
| RelBib Classification: | BH Judaïsme |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Rabbinisme
B Talmud |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1650373260 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20191104163512.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 190311s2002 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1650373260 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)519384741 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ519384741 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Goldsmith, Simcha |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The role of the Tanya Nami Hakhi Baraita |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The technical term תניא נמי הכי is used in the Babylonian Talmud to introduce a baraita that follows a memra. The similar and oftentimes identical language of the memra and baraita raises the question: If there was an extant baraita, why did the amora not quote it? Traditional responses and most modern scholars suggest that the amoraim were not familiar with all of the baraitot. This paper first critiques J.Hauptman's theory that baraitot formed the sugya's earliest redacted stratum, and J.Frenkel's suggestion that memrot, unknown to the amoraim, were really baraitot that preceded the redaction of the Mishnah. In order to clarify the role of the TNH baraita, this paper will analyze other types of sugyot in both Talmuds in which baraitot follow memrot. The evidence suggests that the amoraim's knowledge of the vast tannaitic literature was more comprehensive than assumed by traditional and modern scholars. The amoraim freely quoted baraitot without citing their tannaitic origin and in some instances quoted only relevant sections and not the entire baraita. This gave the false impression that the amoraim were not familiar with the baraitot. TNH baraitot were inserted into sugyot at a later date in order to corroborate the memrot or to footnote the tannaitic origin of the memra. | ||
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4133699-9 |0 (DE-627)105678171 |0 (DE-576)20964611X |a Talmud |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4139772-1 |0 (DE-627)105632902 |0 (DE-576)209697199 |a Rabbinismus |2 gnd |
| 652 | |a BH | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |a Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion |t Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion |d Cincinnati, Ohio : College, 1953 |g 73(2002), Seite 133-156 |w (DE-627)129525642 |w (DE-600)213556-5 |w (DE-576)014944561 |x 0360-9049 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:73 |g year:2002 |g pages:133-156 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1786463393 |k Electronic | ||
| 935 | |a BIIN | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 73 |j 2002 |h 133-156 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| CAN | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3336726832 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1650373260 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191104190013 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190311||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135-1)148056 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |c FTHNT097854/73/GHS |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 2 |b Z 4/278 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a iZSA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043520 |a BH | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Rabbinic Judaism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Rabbinisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Rabinismo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Rabbinismo,Ebraismo rabbinico,Ebraismo rabbinico |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 拉比犹太教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 拉比猶太教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Rabinismo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Раввинизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ραβινισμός |
| SUB | |a CAN |a BIB |a REL | ||
| SYD | 0 | 0 | |a Kasseler Talmudfragmente |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Rabbinische Theologie,Rabbinisches Judentum |