On "being forced to be free": between republican and liberal freedom
The most recent literature on the idea of freedom focuses on the liberal-republican debate regarding the question whether freedom should be defined as non-interference or non-domination. One of the main issues within this debate is whether the liberal concept of freedom as non-interference can prope...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2015]
|
| In: |
Ethical perspectives
Year: 2015, Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 247-270 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Freedom
/ Criterion
/ Exclusion
/ Disturbance
/ Dominance
|
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethics VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1647261856 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180730194609.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160616s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/EP.22.2.3085108 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1647261856 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)470725168 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ470725168 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Shnayderman, Ronen |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On "being forced to be free" |b between republican and liberal freedom |c Ronen Shnayerman, University of Hamburg, Germany |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The most recent literature on the idea of freedom focuses on the liberal-republican debate regarding the question whether freedom should be defined as non-interference or non-domination. One of the main issues within this debate is whether the liberal concept of freedom as non-interference can properly account for the freedom-restrictive nature of domination. In a recent article, however, Michael Harbour argues that, as a matter of fact, neither the liberal concept of freedom as non-interference nor the republican concept of freedom as non-domination is able to properly account for the loss of freedom one suffers under domination. He thus concludes by suggesting that none of the concepts of freedom prominent in the literature can properly account for the freedom-restrictive nature of domination. The present article seeks to refute Harbour's disturbing argument. By doing so it also sheds further light on the ideas of freedom as non-domination and freedom as noninterference and particularly on the precise manner in which domination is inimical to freedom. | ||
| 652 | |a NCA:VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4018326-9 |0 (DE-627)106326430 |0 (DE-576)208923810 |2 gnd |a Freiheit |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4245403-7 |0 (DE-627)104828072 |0 (DE-576)210471131 |2 gnd |a Kriterium |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4200579-6 |0 (DE-627)104122021 |0 (DE-576)210136480 |2 gnd |a Ausschluss |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4133232-5 |0 (DE-627)105681628 |0 (DE-576)209642181 |2 gnd |a Störung |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4150406-9 |0 (DE-627)105553646 |0 (DE-576)209779799 |2 gnd |a Dominanz |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical perspectives |d Leuven : Peeters, 1994 |g 22(2015), 2, Seite 247-270 |w (DE-627)182261980 |w (DE-600)1191627-8 |w (DE-576)040105555 |x 1370-0049 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:247-270 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.22.2.3085108 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 22 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 247-270 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3322201279 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1647261856 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20160629110653 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160616||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Criterion,Disturbance,Dominance,Exclusion,Expulsion,Freedom,Freedom,Liberty,Liberty in art |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Critère,Dominance,Domination,Domination,Exclusion,Liberté,Liberté,Perturbation,Interférence,Interférence |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Criterio,Dominancia,Exclusión,Libertad,Libertad,Perturbación |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Criterio,Disturbo,Dominanza,Esclusione,Libertà,Libertà |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 扰乱,干扰,排斥,标准,准则,规范,自由,自由 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 排斥,擾亂,干擾,標準,準則,規範,自由,自由 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Critério,Dominância,Exclusão,Liberdade,Liberdade,Perturbação |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Доминантность,Исключение,Отстранение,Критерий,Помеха,Расстройство,Свобода (мотив),Свобода |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αποκλεισμός,Διαταραχή,Ελευθερία (μοτίβο),Ελευθερία,Κριτήριο,Κυριαρχία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Freedom , Kriterien , Ausschließung,Ausschluß , Perturbation,Beeinträchtigung,Störungen , Vorherrschaft |