Confucian cosmopolitanism

Scholars in the humanities and social sciences are keenly aware of and often deeply engaged with more global or cosmopolitan approaches to their respective fields; nevertheless, theories of cosmopolitanism remain exceedingly controversial and arise exclusively from Western philosophical sources. Rec...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1954- (Auteur)
Type de support: Numérique/imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley [2014]
Dans: Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2014, Volume: 42, Numéro: 1, Pages: 22-44
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Nussbaum, Martha Craven 1947- / Cosmopolitisme / Confucianisme
RelBib Classification:BM Religions chinoises
VA Philosophie
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Édition parallèle:Électronique
Description
Résumé:Scholars in the humanities and social sciences are keenly aware of and often deeply engaged with more global or cosmopolitan approaches to their respective fields; nevertheless, theories of cosmopolitanism remain exceedingly controversial and arise exclusively from Western philosophical sources. Recently, Martha Nussbaum presented a contemporary Western liberal cosmopolitan theory and sought to integrate it with a call for multicultural education. In this essay, I describe, analyze, and criticize Nussbaum's conception of cosmopolitanism and argue that it does not sit comfortably with her laudable advocacy of multicultural education. I then draw upon resources within the Confucian tradition to sketch two alternative conceptions of cosmopolitanism, which I argue are both more powerful than what Nussbaum proposes and better support the kind of multicultural education she so eloquently advocates.
ISSN:0384-9694
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jore.12043