Infelicitous inter-ritual hospitality

This article focuses on inter-ritual hospitality, ‘where the reciprocal roles of host and guest set the parameters for interaction’ (60). This type of hospitality has the potential to enhance the dialogue between religions; indeed, one may ask whether there can be a greater token of mutual respect a...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Moyaert, Marianne 1979- (Auteur)
Type de support: Numérique/imprimé Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Taylor & Francis [2017]
Dans: Culture and religion
Année: 2017, Volume: 18, Numéro: 3, Pages: 324-342
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Dialogue interreligieux / Hospitalité / Rite / Participation
RelBib Classification:AG Vie religieuse
AX Dialogue interreligieux
Sujets non-standardisés:B inter-rituality
B Ronald Grimes
B Ritual failure
B interreligious hospitality
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This article focuses on inter-ritual hospitality, ‘where the reciprocal roles of host and guest set the parameters for interaction’ (60). This type of hospitality has the potential to enhance the dialogue between religions; indeed, one may ask whether there can be a greater token of mutual respect and appreciation than that of inviting another to share one’s rituals. In this article, however, I am not interested primarily in the success stories of inter-ritual hospitality that have brought growth and enrichment for the parties involved; rather, I will focus my attention on its infelicitous counterparts. The failure of inter-ritual hospitality is a subject that has been explored very little in interreligious studies, and there is little (ethnographic) documentation on this subject. One could say that inter-ritual failure is virgin territory among interreligious scholars. I will begin to explore some of the issues at stake and examine where inter-ritual hospitality can go wrong. In doing so, I continue and expand the research done by ritual scholars who have focused their attention on infelicitous ritual performances conducted mainly in ‘monoreligious’ settings.
ISSN:1475-5610
Contient:Enthalten in: Culture and religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14755610.2017.1339100