The great Iranian divide: between aniconic West and anthropomorphic East
The Avesta and the Rig Veda, our earliest sources for the Indo-Iranian religious tradition, contain ideas and elements with both aniconic and iconic potential. The cultic iconography in Western and Eastern Iran developed in a remarkably different manner. While the Achaemenian and Sasanian cults were...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[2017]
|
Dans: |
Religion
Année: 2017, Volume: 47, Numéro: 3, Pages: 378-398 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Iran (Antiquité)
/ Kushana, Dynastie : 200 avant J.-C.-300
/ Sogdiens
/ Parsisme
/ Art religieux
/ Icône
/ Anthropomorphisme
/ Bilderverbot
|
RelBib Classification: | AG Vie religieuse BC Religions du Proche-Orient ancien KBM Asie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Sasanian
B Aniconism B Iran B Sogdian B Achaemenian B Zoroastrianism B Anthropomorphism B Kushan |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | The Avesta and the Rig Veda, our earliest sources for the Indo-Iranian religious tradition, contain ideas and elements with both aniconic and iconic potential. The cultic iconography in Western and Eastern Iran developed in a remarkably different manner. While the Achaemenian and Sasanian cults were aniconic, Eastern Iranian people, like the Kushans and the Sogdians, not only made use of portrayals of their gods in human form, but also venerated their man-made representations in temples. This article suggests that the reason for this sharp distinction in the nature of the cult between Western and Eastern Iran is the impact of acculturated Greek religious practices, which was much stronger in the East than in the West. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0048-721X |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2017.1330989 |