Natural Theology Reconsidered (Again)
Neither the “traditional” nor the “revisionist” accounts of the nature and fate of natural theology are adequate to the task of explaining the peculiar trajectory of its history and, in particular, the consensus view of its apparent terminal decline. Contrary to the accepted narrative, natural theol...
| Nebentitel: | Issue Theme: Naturalism - Scientific? Religious? Theological? |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch/Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Routledge
[2017]
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Jahr: 2017, Band: 15, Heft: 3, Seiten: 289-301 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus KAA Kirchengeschichte NBC Gotteslehre NBD Schöpfungslehre |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Robert Boyle
B faithful theology B Michael Buckley B Natural Theology B Paul Tillich |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Neither the “traditional” nor the “revisionist” accounts of the nature and fate of natural theology are adequate to the task of explaining the peculiar trajectory of its history and, in particular, the consensus view of its apparent terminal decline. Contrary to the accepted narrative, natural theology was not fatally undermined by the scientific revolution. Even if temporarily marginalized by disciplines such as systematics and dogmatics, natural theology never went away. It is still with us, and it provides a healthy grasp of the divine presence in the natural world. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6700 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2017.1335064 |