Occupying the Ontological Penumbra: Towards a Postsecular and Theologically Minded Anthropology
In the wake of the postsecular turn, we propose to reappraise both the religious as studied in anthropology and how anthropologists who have religious or spiritual interests can contribute to an emerging postsecular anthropology. Such an anthropology recognizes the failure of secularization theory t...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
[2017]
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2017, Volume: 8, Issue: 5, Pages: 1-17 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Ontology B Postsecularism B Religion B Anthropology B Method B Secularism |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1586226355 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190116113013.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190115s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel8050080 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1586226355 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)516226355 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ516226355 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)141902280 |0 (DE-627)632470119 |0 (DE-576)326753532 |4 aut |a Merz, Johannes |d 1929- | |
| 109 | |a Merz, Johannes 1929- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Occupying the Ontological Penumbra |b Towards a Postsecular and Theologically Minded Anthropology |c Johannes Merz |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In the wake of the postsecular turn, we propose to reappraise both the religious as studied in anthropology and how anthropologists who have religious or spiritual interests can contribute to an emerging postsecular anthropology. Such an anthropology recognizes the failure of secularization theory to dissolve the dichotomy between the religious and the secular. We propose that as anthropologists we consciously occupy the ontological penumbra, an ambiguous and plural space in which we engage with various counterparts, both human and nonhuman. This means that we have to be open to the real possibility of the existence of gods, spirits, and other nonhuman entities. These should not only be treated as subjects of study, but also recognized as valid counterparts with whom we can engage in the ethnographic encounter. While this necessitates relinquishing the former privileged position of secular and Western epistemology, it opens up the discipline to a potentially unprecedented ethnographic productivity that is epistemologically and ontologically innovative. Without neglecting its secular heritage, such a theologically minded postsecular anthropology places anthropology in a better position to explore what it is to be human, especially in terms of understanding religious and spiritual experiences. | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 601 | |a Anthropologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Anthropology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Method | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ontology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postsecularism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Secularism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theology | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Merz, Sharon |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 8(2017), 5, Seite 1-17 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2017 |g number:5 |g pages:1-17 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/5/80/pdf?version=1493372288 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/5/80 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8050080 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 2017 |e 5 |h 1-17 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3045387349 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1586226355 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190115115723 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religions,Religion |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Religión,Religión,Religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Religione,Religione,Religione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Religião,Religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Религия,Религия (мотив) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |