Wealth, Well-Being, and the Danger of Having Too Much

It is impossible for an agent who is classically economically rational to have so much wealth that it is harmful for them, since such an agent would simply give away their excess wealth. Actual agents, vulnerable to akrasia and lacking full information, are not economically rational, but economists,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crummett, Dustin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI [2017]
In: Religions
Year: 2017, Volume: 8, Issue: 5, Pages: 1-23
Further subjects:B Ethics
B Well-being
B economic inequality
B Psychology
B Political Philosophy
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1586226290
003 DE-627
005 20190116111117.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190115s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel8050086  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1586226290 
035 |a (DE-576)516226290 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ516226290 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Crummett, Dustin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Crummett, Dustin 
245 1 0 |a Wealth, Well-Being, and the Danger of Having Too Much  |c Dustin Crummett 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is impossible for an agent who is classically economically rational to have so much wealth that it is harmful for them, since such an agent would simply give away their excess wealth. Actual agents, vulnerable to akrasia and lacking full information, are not economically rational, but economists, ethicists and political philosophers have nonetheless mostly ignored the possibility that having too much might be harmful in some ways. I survey the major philosophical theories of well-being and draw on ethics and the social sciences to point out several ways in which, on the most plausible of these theories, having too much, relative to other members of one's society, might be harmful to oneself (for instance, by making it harder for one to have appropriate relationships with others, or by making it more likely than one will develop undesirable character traits). I argue that because egalitarian policies prevent these harms and provide the advantaged with other benefits (such as access to public goods which help rich and poor alike), egalitarian policies are not as harmful to the rich as is commonly supposed, and may even be helpful to them on balance. I close by discussing the practical implications of this. 
650 4 |a economic inequality 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Political Philosophy 
650 4 |a Psychology 
650 4 |a Well-being 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 8(2017), 5, Seite 1-23  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2017  |g number:5  |g pages:1-23 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/5/86/pdf?version=1494246130  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/8/5/86  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8050086  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 8  |j 2017  |e 5  |h 1-23 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3045387284 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1586226290 
LOK |0 005 20190115115721 
LOK |0 008 190115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL