Infused virtue as virtue simply: the centrality of the Augustinian definition in Summa theologiae I/2.55-67

‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some c...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Miner, Robert C. 1970- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Cambridge Univ. Press [2018]
Dans: Scottish journal of theology
Année: 2018, Volume: 71, Numéro: 4, Pages: 411-424
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Aristoteles 384 avant J.-C.-322 avant J.-C. / Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430 / Réception <scientifique> / Thomas, von Aquin, Heiliger 1225-1274, Summa theologiae 1 / Vertu / Habitus
RelBib Classification:KAE Moyen Âge central
KDB Église catholique romaine
NCA Éthique
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Augustine
B Ethics
B infused virtue
B Peter Lombard
B Virtue
B Thomas Aquinas
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:‘Virtue is a good quality of the mind, by which one lives rightly, which no one uses badly, which God works in us without us.' Thomas Aquinas quotes this ‘Augustinian' definition near the beginning of his treatment of virtue in general. Because it fails to apply to acquired virtues, some conclude that Aquinas presents this definition only to set it aside. Against such interpretations, I demonstrate that Thomas' use of the definition is the key to understanding the treatment of virtue at Summa I/2.55-63. First, I show why Thomas places the definition where he does, at the end of question 55. Second, I show that the definition is not peripheral but rather discloses the inner logic of his treatment of virtue. Finally, I show that for the reader who grasps this inner logic, the conclusion drawn explicitly at Question 65 - that only infused virtue is virtue simply - is revealing but not surprising.
ISSN:1475-3065
Contient:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000601