The Unevenness of Political Theology
Those who agree that Carl Schmitt was correct to prefer to political theology to liberalism nonetheless need to develop an account of how an authority structure can sustain itself without imposing an ideology on those over whom it rules. This article suggests that one possibility forward is found in...
Autres titres: | Roundtable: How Theological is Political Theology? |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2018]
|
Dans: |
Political theology
Année: 2018, Volume: 19, Numéro: 8, Pages: 698-703 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Taubes, Jacob 1923-1987
/ Théologie politique
/ Libéralisme
/ Démocratie
/ Mystique
|
RelBib Classification: | CB Spiritualité chrétienne CG Christianisme et politique TK Époque contemporaine VA Philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Mysticism
B Rufus Jones B Jacob Taubes B Carl Schmitt B Political Theology |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Résumé: | Those who agree that Carl Schmitt was correct to prefer to political theology to liberalism nonetheless need to develop an account of how an authority structure can sustain itself without imposing an ideology on those over whom it rules. This article suggests that one possibility forward is found in the mystical political theology of Jacob Taubes's 1955 essay On The Symbolic Order of Modern Democracy, since that essay posits a political body in which sovereignty is distributed, without forcing that distribution in an arbitrary manner. |
---|---|
Description: | Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 19 Numbers 7-8 November-December 2018" |
ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2018.1520847 |