The Unevenness of Political Theology

Those who agree that Carl Schmitt was correct to prefer to political theology to liberalism nonetheless need to develop an account of how an authority structure can sustain itself without imposing an ideology on those over whom it rules. This article suggests that one possibility forward is found in...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Autres titres:Roundtable: How Theological is Political Theology?
Auteur principal: Kavka, Martin (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2018]
Dans: Political theology
Année: 2018, Volume: 19, Numéro: 8, Pages: 698-703
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Taubes, Jacob 1923-1987 / Théologie politique / Libéralisme / Démocratie / Mystique
RelBib Classification:CB Spiritualité chrétienne
CG Christianisme et politique
TK Époque contemporaine
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Mysticism
B Rufus Jones
B Jacob Taubes
B Carl Schmitt
B Political Theology
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Those who agree that Carl Schmitt was correct to prefer to political theology to liberalism nonetheless need to develop an account of how an authority structure can sustain itself without imposing an ideology on those over whom it rules. This article suggests that one possibility forward is found in the mystical political theology of Jacob Taubes's 1955 essay “On The Symbolic Order of Modern Democracy,” since that essay posits a political body in which sovereignty is distributed, without forcing that distribution in an arbitrary manner.
Description:Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 19 Numbers 7-8 November-December 2018"
ISSN:1743-1719
Contient:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2018.1520847