Nicholas of Autrecourt’s Quaestio de intensione visionis Revisited: The scola Oxoniensis and Parisian Masters on Limit Decision Problems

Previously, the author tried to show that some arguments in one of the two versions of Nicholas of Autrecourt’s Quaestio de intensione visionis are taken almost verbatim from the anonymous Tractatus de sex inconvenientibus. This paper concentrates on the arguments themselves in order to consider two...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Walker, Gustavo Fernández (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2017
In: Vivarium
Year: 2017, Volume: 55, Issue: 1/3, Pages: 152-169
RelBib Classification:KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
KAF Church history 1300-1500; late Middle Ages
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B NICHOLAS OF AUTRECOURT John of Jandun John Buridan limit decision problems De caelo commentaries
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1582477663
003 DE-627
005 20211015110927.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 181031s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685349-12341342  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1582477663 
035 |a (DE-576)512477663 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ512477663 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Walker, Gustavo Fernández  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Nicholas of Autrecourt’s Quaestio de intensione visionis Revisited: The scola Oxoniensis and Parisian Masters on Limit Decision Problems 
264 1 |c 2017 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Previously, the author tried to show that some arguments in one of the two versions of Nicholas of Autrecourt’s Quaestio de intensione visionis are taken almost verbatim from the anonymous Tractatus de sex inconvenientibus. This paper concentrates on the arguments themselves in order to consider two main issues: (a) the ‘translatability’ of limit decision problems, manifest in Autrecourt’s juxtaposition of questions de maximo et minimo, de primo et ultimo instanti, and the intension and remission of forms; (b) the importance of Parisian discussions of limit decision problems prior to the adoption of the new analytical languages developed at Oxford. Thus, the paper is divided in two sections, the first concerning some arguments of Autrecourt’s question, the second focusing on the link between one of Autrecourt’s arguments and the medieval tradition of commentaries on Aristotle’s De caelo, in which it is possible to find some antecedents of the analytical approach that later Parisian scholars (Autrecourt among them) would apply to these problems. 
601 |a Quaestio 
601 |a Intension 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a NICHOLAS OF AUTRECOURT  |x John of Jandun  |x John Buridan  |x limit decision problems  |x De caelo commentaries 
652 |a KAE:KAF:VA 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Vivarium  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1963  |g 55(2017), 1/3, Seite 152-169  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)325567093  |w (DE-600)2036954-2  |w (DE-576)094145016  |x 1568-5349  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:2017  |g number:1/3  |g pages:152-169 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341342  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 55  |j 2017  |e 1/3  |h 152-169 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3030161412 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1582477663 
LOK |0 005 20211015110927 
LOK |0 008 181031||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044535  |a KAF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044462  |a KAE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL