Design Discourse: A Way Forward for Theistic Evolutionism?
It is usually supposed that biological design arguments (where biological complex order is seen as evidence of a Creator) are made obsolete by Darwinian evolutionary theory. However, philosopher Alvin Plantinga and others have defended the continued possibility of a rational “design discourse”, in w...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2018
|
| In: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Year: 2018, Volume: 60, Issue: 3, Pages: 435-451 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Plantinga, Alvin 1932-
/ Intelligent design
/ Evolutionism
/ Theism
/ Evil
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God NBD Doctrine of Creation NCA Ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
theistic evolutionism
teleology
design argument
problem of natural evil
Alvin Plantinga
B theistischer Evolutionismus Teleology Design Argument Problem des natürlichen Übels Alvin Plantinga |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1581003390 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210426095443.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180917s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/nzsth-2018-0025 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1581003390 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)511003390 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ511003390 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-B1597)nzsth-2018-0025 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1060278472 |0 (DE-627)799375462 |0 (DE-576)41638899X |4 aut |a Kojonen, Erkki Vesa Rope |d 1982- | |
| 109 | |a Kojonen, Erkki Vesa Rope 1982- |a Rope Kojonen, Erkki Vesa 1982- |a Vesa Rope Kojonen, Erkki 1982- |a Kojonen, Erkki V. R. 1982- |a Kojonen, E. V. R. 1982- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Design Discourse: A Way Forward for Theistic Evolutionism? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a It is usually supposed that biological design arguments (where biological complex order is seen as evidence of a Creator) are made obsolete by Darwinian evolutionary theory. However, philosopher Alvin Plantinga and others have defended the continued possibility of a rational “design discourse”, in which biological order is taken as a sign of God’s purposeful action. In this article, I consider two objections to design discourse: (1) a theological objection to biological design based on the problem of natural evil, and (2) the evolutionary objection, according to which evolutionary theory removes the justification for any biological design perception. Whereas Plantinga’s own response utilizes the arguments of the Intelligent Design movement, I argue in favor of utilizing “design discourse” as part of a theistic evolutionist view. | ||
| 520 | |a Es wird gemeinhin angenommen, dass biologische Design Argumente (welche die komplexe biologische Ordnung als Beweis für einen Schöpfer erachten) durch Darwins Evolutionstheorie obsolet werden. Der Philosoph Alvin Plantinga und andere haben jedoch die Möglichkeit eines fortgeführten rationalen „Design Diskurses“ verteidigt, der die biologische Ordnung als ein Zeichen Gottes zielgerichteter Handlung begreift. In diesem Artikel betrachte ich zwei Einwände gegen den Design Diskurs: (1) einen theologischen Einwand zum biologischen Design basierend auf dem Problem der natürlichen Übel und (2) den evolutionären Einwand, nach dem die Evolutionstheorie die Berechtigung jeder biologischen Design Vorstellung aufhebt. Während Plantingas eigene Antwort die Argumente der intelligenten Design Bewegung anwendet, argumentiere ich für die Anwendung des „Design Diskurses“ als Element einer theistischen evolutionären Sicht. | ||
| 601 | |a Evolution | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a theistic evolutionism |x teleology |x design argument |x problem of natural evil |x Alvin Plantinga | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theistischer Evolutionismus |x Teleologie |x Design Argument |x Problem des natürlichen Übels |x Alvin Plantinga | |
| 652 | |a AB:NBC:NBD:NCA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)119153114 |0 (DE-627)079948650 |0 (DE-576)211419141 |2 gnd |a Plantinga, Alvin |d 1932- |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4787084-9 |0 (DE-627)391031899 |0 (DE-576)216393272 |2 gnd |a Intelligent Design |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4113486-2 |0 (DE-627)105829137 |0 (DE-576)209476877 |2 gnd |a Evolutionismus |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4007524-2 |0 (DE-627)104162554 |0 (DE-576)208870830 |2 gnd |a Das Böse |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie |d Berlin : De Gruyter, 1963 |g 60(2018), 3, Seite 435-451 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)330068520 |w (DE-600)2049677-1 |w (DE-576)094533318 |x 1612-9520 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:435-451 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2018-0025 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 60 |j 2018 |e 3 |h 435-451 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3025613122 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1581003390 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210426095443 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180917||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a gruy | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051531 |a NBD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Evil,Evil,Evolutionism,Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory,Theism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dessein intelligent,Le mal,Théisme,Évolutionnisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Diseño inteligente,El malo,Evolucionismo,Teísmo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Disegno intelligente,Evoluzionismo,Il male,Teismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 有神论,罪恶,恶,邪恶,罪恶,恶,邪恶,进化论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 有神論,罪惡,惡,邪惡,罪惡,惡,邪惡,進化論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Desenho inteligente,Evolucionismo,O mal,Teísmo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Зло,Интеллегентный дизайн,Теизм,Эволюционизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Εξελικτισμός,Ευφυής σχεδιασμός,Θεϊσμός,Το Κακό |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Plantinga, Alvin C.,1932- , Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh , Das Böse |