Contemporary Uses of the Golden Rule of Reciprocity in Abrahamic Interfaith Discourses

The second half of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first centuries have witnessed a revival of the Golden Rule arguments in relation to the idea of religious toleration. Apologizing or acknowledging apologies for past mistakes, the Abrahamic religions have produced a series of texts in...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Untea, Ionut 1982- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage [2018]
Dans: Studies in religion
Année: 2018, Volume: 47, Numéro: 1, Pages: 107-136
Sujets non-standardisés:B Abrahamic monotheistic religions
B A Common Word
B Reconciliation
B Religious Tolerance
B Nostra Aetate
B Dabru Emet
B Golden Rule
B Interfaith Dialogue
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:The second half of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first centuries have witnessed a revival of the Golden Rule arguments in relation to the idea of religious toleration. Apologizing or acknowledging apologies for past mistakes, the Abrahamic religions have produced a series of texts inviting further ethical and theological discussions with the purpose of facilitating reconciliation and working to maintain a sustainable world peace. Inspired by three groundbreaking texts, Nostra Aetate (1965), Dabru Emet (2000), and A Common Word (2007), representatives of all three monotheisms have produced a number of important commentaries, responses, and critiques with the purpose of clarifying some key points that both unite and separate the interpretations, given the familiar look of common doctrinal and moral teachings.
ISSN:2042-0587
Contient:Enthalten in: Studies in religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0008429817721904