Texts in quarantine: Karl Barth, biblical interpretation and imaginative resistance
This essay explores the overlapping territory between the phenomenon known as imaginative resistance' in literary, psychological and philosophical circles and Karl Barth's theological hermeneutic. Imaginative resistance refers to the way readers are willing to give consent to all sorts of...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
Dans: |
Scottish journal of theology
Année: 2018, Volume: 71, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-15 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Exégèse
/ Herméneutique
/ Parole de Dieu
/ Lecteur
/ Résistance
|
RelBib Classification: | CD Christianisme et culture HA Bible KAJ Époque contemporaine KDD Église protestante NBB Révélation VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Karl Barth
B Scripture B Word of God B Literary Theory B Hermeneutics B imaginative resistance |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | This essay explores the overlapping territory between the phenomenon known as imaginative resistance' in literary, psychological and philosophical circles and Karl Barth's theological hermeneutic. Imaginative resistance refers to the way readers are willing to give consent to all sorts of implausible things in the context of a fiction, but become uneasy when asked to imagine that something they consider morally or ethically reprehensible is good. The essay offers an overview of the current scholarly theories regarding the origins of the phenomenon of imaginative resistance, arguing that none of them provide an adequate account of imaginative resistance in relation to a text read as Word of God'. The essay suggests that Karl Barth's theological hermeneutic does not offer a solution' to imaginative resistance in relation to scripture, but rather deepens and redescribes it in meaningful ways by acknowledging the appropriateness of the interpreter's resistance while encouraging continued engagement even with the claims of challenging biblical texts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930617000631 |