Commands as Divine Attributes
Theories of ethics that attempt to incorporate divine speech or commands as necessary elements in the construction of moral obligations are often viewed as vulnerable to a challenge based on the so-called Euthyphro dilemma. According to this challenge, opponents of theistic ethics suppose that divin...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 44, Issue: 4, Pages: 581-605 |
Further subjects: | B
Uṣūl al-fiqh
B Islam B divine commands B Euthyphro B al-amr B Autonomy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1580209599 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180820181152.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180820s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12154 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1580209599 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)510209599 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510209599 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1165021528 |0 (DE-627)1029234817 |0 (DE-576)510217206 |4 aut |a Farahat, Omar | |
109 | |a Farahat, Omar | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Commands as Divine Attributes |c Omar Farahat |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Theories of ethics that attempt to incorporate divine speech or commands as necessary elements in the construction of moral obligations are often viewed as vulnerable to a challenge based on the so-called Euthyphro dilemma. According to this challenge, opponents of theistic ethics suppose that divine speech either informs one of a preexisting set of values and obligations, which makes it inconsequential, or is entirely arbitrary, which makes it irrational. This essay analyzes some of the debates on the nature of divine commands in eleventh-century works of Islamic jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh). I show that Muʿtazilī jurisprudents advanced the view that divine commands were actions performed in time that had concrete manifestations, while Ashʿarīs argued that divine speech in general, and commands in particular, were eternal divine attributes. After exposing certain weaknesses in the Euthyphro-inspired objections to theistic ethics, I argue that the Ashʿarī idea of commands as divine attributes is a promising move for scholars interested in defending a divine command view of moral obligation. | ||
601 | |a Attribution | ||
650 | 4 | |a Euthyphro | |
650 | 4 | |a Islam | |
650 | 4 | |a al-amr | |
650 | 4 | |a Autonomy | |
650 | 4 | |a divine commands | |
650 | 4 | |a Uṣūl al-fiqh | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 44(2016), 4, Seite 581-605 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:581-605 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12154 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12154 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 44 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 581-605 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3022667604 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1580209599 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180820154615 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam,Uṣūl al-fiqh |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam,Uṣūl al-fiqh,Usul al-Fiqh,Usul al-Fiqh |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam,Usul al-fiqh |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam,Uṣūl al-fiqh,Usul al-fiqh,Usul al-fiqh |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯兰教,伊斯兰教,回教,回教 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯蘭教,伊斯蘭教,回教,回教 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Islã,Islã,Usul al-fiqh |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Ислам (мотив),Ислам,Усуль аль-фикх |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ισλάμ (μοτίβο),Ισλάμ,Ουσούλ αλ-φικχ |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Islam , Uṣūl al-fiḳh,ʿIlm al-uṣūl,أصول الفقه |