A Response to Participation: A Religious Worldview by James M. Gustafson
This response offers an interpretation of James Gustafson's Participation: A Religious Worldview, which thinks with Gustafson on the theme of participation, while highlighting points where my own thoughts diverge from his. The essay begins by drawing the reader's attention to Gustafson...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 44, Issue: 1, Pages: 176-185 |
| Further subjects: | B
Participation
B active interdependence B James M. Gustafson B Self-determination |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1580209408 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180820154606.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180820s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12136 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1580209408 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)510209408 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510209408 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)131396250 |0 (DE-627)508770521 |0 (DE-576)164722203 |4 aut |a Schweiker, William |d 1953- | |
| 109 | |a Schweiker, William 1953- |a Schweiker, William Alexander 1953- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Response to Participation |b A Religious Worldview by James M. Gustafson |c William Schweiker |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This response offers an interpretation of James Gustafson's Participation: A Religious Worldview, which thinks with Gustafson on the theme of participation, while highlighting points where my own thoughts diverge from his. The essay begins by drawing the reader's attention to Gustafson's style, arguing that the simple elegance of his writing constitutes part of his larger claim about the need to remove ourselves from the center of our thought. Next, the essay analyzes Gustafson's use of participation by putting it in context and connecting it with his broader methodology. Finally, I draw the reader's attention to important loci in the text in order to show how Gustafson's essay helps address various extant misinterpretations of his thought but also to point to ways in which my thinking with Gustafson leads me to think otherwise than he does. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a James M. Gustafson | |
| 650 | 4 | |a active interdependence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Participation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-determination | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 44(2016), 1, Seite 176-185 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:176-185 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12136 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12136 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 44 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 176-185 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3022667396 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1580209408 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180820154606 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||