The Community of Solitude

This paper re-examines the egos of Edmund Husserl and Max Scheler with reference to Friedrich Nietzsche and the psychologist, James Hillman, and in the process also confronts the ego in other of its many manifestations, misappropriations, and mystifications.The ego is a multi-headed enigma which def...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Pulte, Christopher (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Rhodes University [2016]
Dans: The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology
Année: 2016, Volume: 16, Numéro: 1/2, Pages: 1-10
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Husserl, Edmund 1859-1938 / Egologie / Scheler, Max 1874-1928 / Hillman, James 1926-2011 / Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
RelBib Classification:VA Philosophie
ZD Psychologie
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:This paper re-examines the egos of Edmund Husserl and Max Scheler with reference to Friedrich Nietzsche and the psychologist, James Hillman, and in the process also confronts the ego in other of its many manifestations, misappropriations, and mystifications.The ego is a multi-headed enigma which defies phenomenological description, and only reaches the status of concept by virtue of the gropings of an epistemology which is not up to the task. The goal of this paper is twofold: firstly, to come to terms with what is commonly spoken of as ego, and secondly, to devise a scheme which does justice to it as phenomenon.
ISSN:1445-7377
Contient:Enthalten in: The Indo-Pacific journal of phenomenology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/20797222.2016.1214364