Policies of Radicalisation as Anti- and Countercult Ideologies
The similarities between research in ‘new religious movements’ and radicalization has been noticed by several scholars. This article however attempt to view the entire logic of ‘radicalization controversies’ through the lens of ‘cult controveries’. With a point of departure in material from Denmark,...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2018
|
| Dans: |
Journal of Muslims in Europe
Année: 2018, Volume: 7, Numéro: 2, Pages: 211-236 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Radicalisation
Denmark
counter-jihad
new religious movements
Hizb ut-Tahrir
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | The similarities between research in ‘new religious movements’ and radicalization has been noticed by several scholars. This article however attempt to view the entire logic of ‘radicalization controversies’ through the lens of ‘cult controveries’. With a point of departure in material from Denmark, similarities are found between the position of scholars attempting to provide nuanced understandings of complex phenomena as well as in dynamics between radical groups and counter-jihad groups. The article suggests that current understandings of processes of radicalisation, de-radicalisation and securitisation may benefit from insights from comparisons with anti-cult movements setting the agenda for public discourses on NRM movements in the 1980s. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2211-7954 |
| Contient: | In: Journal of Muslims in Europe
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22117954-12341367 |