Revolutionary Love as Shared Interreligious Comparative Category: Christian Engagements with Engaged Buddhism and Gandhian Nonviolence
Is revolutionary love a narrowly Christian category inappropriate as a theme for the American Academy of Religion? This paper argues no. Revolutionary love can be reconfigured as a vague interreligious category. This paper does that conceptual work and then proceeds to show that both Engaged Buddhis...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
School
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Toronto journal of theology
Année: 2017, Volume: 33, Numéro: 2, Pages: 165-180 |
| RelBib Classification: | BK Hindouisme BL Bouddhisme NCC Éthique sociale NCD Éthique et politique |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Comparative Theology
B comparative category B revolutionary love B Mohandas Gandhi B Vagueness |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Is revolutionary love a narrowly Christian category inappropriate as a theme for the American Academy of Religion? This paper argues no. Revolutionary love can be reconfigured as a vague interreligious category. This paper does that conceptual work and then proceeds to show that both Engaged Buddhists and Gandhian Hindus can recognize revolutionary love as a meaningful category for their communities and traditions. By demonstrating that revolutionary love is no merely Christian category, this paper suggests that the theme is not only appropriate for a body such as the AAR but can also help those groups within the AAR that are interested in normative conversation across religious boundaries to have those conversations. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1918-6371 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Toronto journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3138/tjt.2017-0169 |