"God's Only Begotten Son": A Reply to R. T. Mullins
R. T. Mullins objects, as do a number of contemporary evangelical theologians, to the doctrine of processions in God. In my recent book on the Trinity I affirmed and defended this doctrine. Mullins has provided a lengthy critique of my defense, and this is my reply. The reply comprises four main e...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2017]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 217-237 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Trinity
|
| RelBib Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1575279266 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180813230005.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180517s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.1942 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1575279266 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)505279266 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ505279266 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1025833031 |0 (DE-627)724880097 |0 (DE-576)166104396 |4 aut |a Hasker, William |d 1935- | |
| 109 | |a Hasker, William 1935- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a "God's Only Begotten Son" |b A Reply to R. T. Mullins |c William Hasker |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a R. T. Mullins objects, as do a number of contemporary evangelical theologians, to the doctrine of processions in God. In my recent book on the Trinity I affirmed and defended this doctrine. Mullins has provided a lengthy critique of my defense, and this is my reply. The reply comprises four main elements. First, there is a brief summary of the doctrine of processions. This is followed by a consideration of the three principal objections to the doctrine developed by Mullins. Next, there is a discussion of the difficulties for the doctrine of the Trinity if the doctrine of processions is rejected. Finally, I provide a positive account of the coherence and evidential support for the doctrine of processions. | ||
| 652 | |a NBC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4117249-8 |0 (DE-627)105800708 |0 (DE-576)209508353 |2 gnd |a Trinitätslehre |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 9(2017), 4, Seite 217-237 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:217-237 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1942 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.1942 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 9 |j 2017 |e 4 |h 217-237 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3009734409 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1575279266 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180813103840 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Trinity |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Doctrine de la Trinité |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Doctrina de la trinidad |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dottrina della trinità |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 三一论,三一教义 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 三一論,三一教義 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Doutrina da trindade |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Учение о Троице |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Τριαδικό δόγμα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Trinitarische Gotteslehre,Trinitätstheologie |