Human rights and religions: ‘living together' or dying apart? A critical assessment of the dissenting opinion in S.A.S. v. France and the notion of ‘living together'

As universalism and pluralism collide when law and religion meet, is freedom of religion balanced between the universality of human rights and the religious particularities of states? To reach an answer, a thorough analysis of the ECtHR judgement S.A.S. v. France is presented, including the joint pa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tsevas, Christos (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge [2017]
In: Religion, state & society
Year: 2017, Volume: 45, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 203-215
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte / Human rights / Community / Religious freedom
Further subjects:B burqa
B international and comparative law
B Diversity
B European consensus
B Freedom Of Religion
B S.A.S
B living together
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1571262156
003 DE-627
005 20190830231515.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180320s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09637494.2017.1390854  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1571262156 
035 |a (DE-576)501262156 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ501262156 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tsevas, Christos  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Human rights and religions  |b ‘living together' or dying apart? A critical assessment of the dissenting opinion in S.A.S. v. France and the notion of ‘living together'  |c Christos Tsevas 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a As universalism and pluralism collide when law and religion meet, is freedom of religion balanced between the universality of human rights and the religious particularities of states? To reach an answer, a thorough analysis of the ECtHR judgement S.A.S. v. France is presented, including the joint partly dissenting opinion of Judges Nussberger and Jäderblom. I focus on the notion of ‘living together' when interpreting the majority and dissenting opinions in accordance with the nexus of human rights and religions. A second aim focuses on the use of comparative and international law in clarifying the notion of European consensus, and the way this argument is reflected in case-law and legal reasoning in one of the most discussed and controversial decisions of the ECtHR. 
601 |a Religion 
601 |a Dissenters 
650 4 |a burqa 
650 4 |a Diversity 
650 4 |a European consensus 
650 4 |a Freedom Of Religion 
650 4 |a international and comparative law 
650 4 |a living together 
650 4 |a S.A.S 
689 0 0 |d b  |0 (DE-588)1003803-6  |0 (DE-627)103022066  |0 (DE-576)191153036  |2 gnd  |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4074725-6  |0 (DE-627)106088556  |0 (DE-576)209195088  |2 gnd  |a Menschenrecht 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4020015-2  |0 (DE-627)106319590  |0 (DE-576)208931538  |2 gnd  |a Gemeinschaft 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4125186-6  |0 (DE-627)105742090  |0 (DE-576)209574488  |2 gnd  |a Religionsfreiheit 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion, state & society  |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1992  |g 45(2017), 3/4, Seite 203-215  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270928073  |w (DE-600)1478007-0  |w (DE-576)097188581  |x 1465-3974  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:45  |g year:2017  |g number:3/4  |g pages:203-215 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2017.1390854  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 45  |j 2017  |e 3/4  |h 203-215 
951 |a AR 
CAN |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3003784420 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1571262156 
LOK |0 005 20180320153210 
LOK |0 008 180320||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Community,Community,Human rights,Human rights,Religious freedom,Freedom of religion,Religious liberty 
STB 0 0 |a Communauté,Communauté,Droit de l’homme,Droitsde l’homme,Droit humain,Droit humain,Droits de l'homme (droit international),Droit humain (motif),Droit humain,Liberté religieuse 
STC 0 0 |a Comunidad,Comunidad,Comunión,Comunión,Comunión (Motivo),Comunión,Derechos Humanos,Derechos Humanos,Libertad de religión 
STD 0 0 |a Comunità,Comunità,Diritti umani <motivo>,Diritti umani,Diritti dell'uomo,Diritti dell'uomo,Diritti dell'uomo (motivo),Diritti dell'uomo,Libertà di religione 
STE 0 0 |a 人权,宗教自由,信教自由,群体,群体,共同体,社群,共同体,社群 
STF 0 0 |a 人權,宗教自由,信教自由,群體,群體,共同體,社群,共同體,社群 
STG 0 0 |a Comunidade,Comunidade,Comunhão (Motivo),Comunhão,Direitos Humanos,Direitos Humanos,Liberdade de religião 
STH 0 0 |a Единство,Единство,Права человека (мотив),Права человека,Свобода вероисповедания 
STI 0 0 |a Ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα <μοτίβο>,Ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα,Δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου,Δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου (μοτίβο),Θρησκευτική ελευθερία,Κοινότητα (μοτίβο),Κοινότητα 
SUB |a CAN  |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Europarat,Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte,EGMR,European Court of Human Rights,ECHR,ECtHR,Cour Européenne des Droits de l'Homme,Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos,Emberi Jogok Európai Bíróság,Curtea Europeană a Drepturilor Omului,Evropski Sud za Ljudska Prava,Evropejski Săd po Pravata na Čoveka,Evropský Soud pro Lidská Práva,Europejski Trybunał Praw Człowieka,Tribunal Europeu dos Direitos do Homem , Menschenrechte,Menschenrechte , Community,Soziale Gemeinschaft,Gemeinschaften , Religiöse Freiheit 
TIM |a 100019590101_100020241231  |b 1959 - 2024