Theological Influences in Scientific Research Programs: Natural Theology "in Reverse"
The Boyle Lectures were created to promote natural theology, where science leads to belief in God. Russell's 2017 Boyle Lecture moves in the "opposite" direction, showing how theological convictions held, often implicitly, by research scientists can play a creative role in both the co...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Theology and science
Année: 2017, Volume: 15, Numéro: 4, Pages: 378-394 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion CF Christianisme et science KAJ Époque contemporaine NBD Création |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
natural theology "in reverse"
B Hoyle B creative mutual interaction Einstein B theological and philosophical influences in science B Natural Theology |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | The Boyle Lectures were created to promote natural theology, where science leads to belief in God. Russell's 2017 Boyle Lecture moves in the "opposite" direction, showing how theological convictions held, often implicitly, by research scientists can play a creative role in both the construction of scientific theories and the choice between existing theories. As examples, Russell explores the conflicts over Big Bang versus Steady-State cosmologies, and between Einstein and Bohr about quantum mechanics. Against the claim that these influences die off once the conflict is over, Russell shows that they continue to be inherited by successive generations of scientists. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6700 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "A Response to Professor Russell (2017)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2017.1369751 |