The Broken Tradition
The present article documents a series of errors discovered in letters of the Lusatian theosopher Jacob Böhme (1575–1624) dating from 1621 and 1623. These errors, some of which were present in the manuscript tradition, some of which were introduced in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century printed edit...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Aries
Year: 2018, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 96-125 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Böhme, Jakob 1575-1624
/ Commentary
/ Text history
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AZ New religious movements |
| Further subjects: | B
Jacob Boehme
scribal publication
scholarly editions
print culture
theosophy
prosopography
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1568106211 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200618170353.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180206s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15700593-01801001 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1568106211 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)498106217 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ498106217 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1051824907 |0 (DE-627)786875291 |0 (DE-576)407464867 |4 aut |a Penman, Leigh T. I. |d 1979- | |
| 109 | |a Penman, Leigh T. I. 1979- |a Penman, Leigh Travis Ian 1979- |a Penman, L. T. I. 1979- |a Penman, Leigh Travis I. 1979- |a Penman, Leigh 1979- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Broken Tradition |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The present article documents a series of errors discovered in letters of the Lusatian theosopher Jacob Böhme (1575–1624) dating from 1621 and 1623. These errors, some of which were present in the manuscript tradition, some of which were introduced in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century printed editions, have influenced modern scholarly opinion on Böhme’s works concerning the doctrine of predestination, as well as the identity and influence of several members of his networks. This contribution aims to correct this troubling accumulation of errors by going ad fontes and re-examining the extant manuscript corpus, and uniting insights won through a thorough review of the transmission of the letters with extensive prosopographical research. This investigation highlights the need for a new edition of Böhme’s correspondence, as well as the potential textual unreliability of Theosophia Revelata (1730), the de facto standard edition of Böhme’s works. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Jacob Boehme |x scribal publication |x scholarly editions |x print culture |x theosophy |x prosopography | |
| 652 | |a AB:AZ | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118512579 |0 (DE-627)135631068 |0 (DE-576)208870415 |2 gnd |a Böhme, Jakob |d 1575-1624 |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4136710-8 |0 (DE-627)104500719 |0 (DE-576)209671467 |2 gnd |a Kommentar |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4117192-5 |0 (DE-627)104297603 |0 (DE-576)209507861 |2 gnd |a Textgeschichte |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Aries |d Leiden : Brill, 2001 |g 18(2018), 1, Seite 96-125 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)349880581 |w (DE-600)2082129-3 |w (DE-576)10940324X |x 1570-0593 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:96-125 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700593-01801001 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 18 |j 2018 |e 1 |h 96-125 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2995328589 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1568106211 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200618170353 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043326 |a AZ | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Commentary,Text history,Text tradition,Tradition,Textual tradition |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Commentaire,Histoire du texte |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Comentario,Historia textual |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Commento,Storia del testo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 文本历史,注释,解释,评注 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 文本歷史,注釋,解釋,評注 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Comentário,História textual |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a История текста,Комментарий |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ιστορία κειμένου,Σχόλιο |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a B'ome, Jakob,1575-1624,Beme, Jakob,1575-1624,Bëme, Jakob,1575-1624,Philadelphus, Desiderius,1575-1624,Teutonicus Philosophus,1575-1624,Teutonicus,Philosophus,1575-1624,Teutonicus,Philosophicus,1575-1624,Böhmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhm, Jacob,1575-1624,Behme, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohmius, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohemus, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohemius, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohmius, Iacobus,1575-1624,Böhme, Jacobus,1575-1624,J. B. T.,1575-1624,Böehme, Jakob,1575-1624,Bohme, Jacob,1575-1624,Desiderius,Philadelphus,1575-1624,Boehme, Jakob,1575-1624,Boehme, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhme, Giacomo,1575-1624,Behmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Beem, Jacob,1575-1624,Beme, Jacob,1575-1624,Boemus, Jacobus,1575-1624,Behme, Jacob,1575-1624,Behm, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhme, Jacob,1575-1624,Behman, Jacob,1575-1624,Teutonicus,1575-1624,Beme, Jacobus,1575-1624,Böhmen, Jakob,1575-1624,Böhm, J.,1575-1624,Behmen, Iacob,1575-1624,Bohmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Bêhme, Jacob,1575-1624 , Kommentare , Textüberlieferung,Überlieferung,Überlieferungsgeschichte,Text |