The morality of faith in Martin Buber and William James

Some philosophers have become atheists because of 'intellectual probity.' Martin Buber relates two occasions during which he advocated his view of the term 'God' and rejected alternative perspectives. He never justified the basis for either his advocacy or his rejection, yet both...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Breslauer, S. Daniel 1942- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2017]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 82, Issue: 2, Pages: 153-174
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Buber, Martin 1878-1965 / James, William 1842-1910 / Idea of God / Faith / Moralische Forderung
Further subjects:B Atheism
B William James
B Leo Strauss
B Religion
B Faith
B Buber, Martin, 1878-1965
B James, William, 1842-1910
B Ethics
B Intellectual probity
B Jewish Theology
B Judaism
B Zionism
B Martin Buber
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1567852548
003 DE-627
005 20221110132813.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180130s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-017-9620-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567852548 
035 |a (DE-576)497852543 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497852543 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)123960592  |0 (DE-627)085549754  |0 (DE-576)293959838  |4 aut  |a Breslauer, S. Daniel  |d 1942- 
109 |a Breslauer, S. Daniel 1942-  |a Breslauer, Samuel Daniel 1942-  |a Breslauer, S. D. 1942- 
245 1 4 |a The morality of faith in Martin Buber and William James  |c Samuel Breslauer 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Some philosophers have become atheists because of 'intellectual probity.' Martin Buber relates two occasions during which he advocated his view of the term 'God' and rejected alternative perspectives. He never justified the basis for either his advocacy or his rejection, yet both play an important role in all his writing, especially his specific type of Zionism. Using what has been called the mere theism of William James' 'The Will to Believe' and the criteria for faith that James advances in that essay illuminates both Buber's general view of the divine and more particularly his Zionism. Once Buber, no less than James, is understood as a mere theist the basis of what he accepts and what he rejects as true religion becomes clearer. Buber's theism meets James' requirement of being a live, forced, momentous option and his Zionism also strives to meet those standards. 
601 |a Buber, Martin 
601 |a Williams, A. N. 
650 4 |a Atheism 
650 4 |a Buber, Martin, 1878-1965 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Faith 
650 4 |a Intellectual probity 
650 4 |a James, William, 1842-1910 
650 4 |a Jewish Theology 
650 4 |a Judaism 
650 4 |a Leo Strauss 
650 4 |a Martin Buber 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a William James 
650 4 |a Zionism 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118516477  |0 (DE-627)133399109  |0 (DE-576)208877088  |2 gnd  |a Buber, Martin  |d 1878-1965 
689 0 1 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118556851  |0 (DE-627)134292499  |0 (DE-576)208977252  |2 gnd  |a James, William  |d 1842-1910 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4125333-4  |0 (DE-627)105741027  |0 (DE-576)209575727  |2 gnd  |a Gottesvorstellung 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4071867-0  |0 (DE-627)104707917  |0 (DE-576)209185139  |2 gnd  |a Glaube 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)7538658-6  |0 (DE-627)516217879  |0 (DE-576)256283583  |2 gnd  |a Moralische Forderung 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 82(2017), 2, Seite 153-174  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:82  |g year:2017  |g number:2  |g pages:153-174 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-017-9620-7  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 82  |j 2017  |e 2  |h 153-174 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 299457635X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567852548 
LOK |0 005 20180130124347 
LOK |0 008 180130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Faith,Faith,Belief in God,Idea of God,God,God,God,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Foi,Foi,Image de Dieu,Image de Dieu,Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Concepto de Dios,Concepto de Dios,Fe,Fe,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Fede,Fede,Immagine di Dio,Immagine di Dio,Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,宗教,宗教,神的概念,上帝的概念 
STF 0 0 |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,宗教,宗教,神的概念,上帝的概念 
STG 0 0 |a Conceito de Deus,Conceito de Deus,Fé,Fé,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Вера (мотив),Вера,Представление Бога (мотив),Представление Бога,Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Εικόνα του Θεού (μοτίβο),Εικόνα του Θεού,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Πίστη (μοτίβο),Πίστη 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie 
SYG 0 0 |a Būber, Mordekaj Marṭin,1878-1965,Buber, Martin Mordehai,1878-1965,Buber, Marṭin,1878-1965,Mpumper, Martin,1878-1965,Bûber, Mordekay Martîn,1878-1965,Būbā, Marutin,1878-1965,Buber, Mordehai Martin,1878-1965,Buber, Mordekhai Marṭin,1878-1965 , James, Willam,1842-1910,Džejms, Vilijam,1842-1910,Džėms, Uilʹjam,1842-1910,Džems, Vilʹjam,1842-1910,Džems, Villʹjam,1842-1910,Ṿilyam Gʹaims,1842-1910 , Gottesbegriff,Gottesgedanke,Gottesidee,Gotteskonzept,Gottesbild,Götterbild,Gott , Glauben,Gottesglaube,Überzeugung