On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism

For a long time many philosophers felt the incoherence objection was a decisive objection to rule-consequentialism, but that position has recently become less secure, because Brad Hooker has offered a clever new way for rule-consequentialists to avoid the incoherence objection. Hooker’s response def...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Rajczi, Alex (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Springer Science + Business Media B. V [2016]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Jahr: 2016, Band: 19, Heft: 4, Seiten: 857-876
RelBib Classification:NCA Ethik
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Rule-utilitarianism
B Incoherence objection
B Rule-consequentialism
B Brad Hooker
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1565748654
003 DE-627
005 20180731121829.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 171127s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-016-9687-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1565748654 
035 |a (DE-576)49574865X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ49574865X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rajczi, Alex  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Rajczi, Alex 
245 1 0 |a On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism  |c Alex Rajczi 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a For a long time many philosophers felt the incoherence objection was a decisive objection to rule-consequentialism, but that position has recently become less secure, because Brad Hooker has offered a clever new way for rule-consequentialists to avoid the incoherence objection. Hooker’s response defeats traditional forms of the incoherence objection, but this paper argues that another version of the problem remains. Several possible solutions fail. One other does not, but it introduces other problems into the theory. I conclude that the new incoherence objection still poses a major challenge to rule-consequentialism, though not for the reasons usually assumed. It does not constitute a fatal objection to rule-consequentialism but instead highlights a theoretical drawback in the theory which must be taken into account during a more holistic evaluation of rule-consequentialism and its rivals. 
650 4 |a Brad Hooker 
650 4 |a Incoherence objection 
650 4 |a Rule-consequentialism 
650 4 |a Rule-utilitarianism 
652 |a NCA:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 19(2016), 4, Seite 857-876  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g pages:857-876 
856 |u https://philarchive.org/rec/RAJOTI  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-016-9687-8  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9687-8  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 19  |j 2016  |e 4  |h 857-876 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2988311560 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1565748654 
LOK |0 005 20191104125826 
LOK |0 008 171127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL