On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism
For a long time many philosophers felt the incoherence objection was a decisive objection to rule-consequentialism, but that position has recently become less secure, because Brad Hooker has offered a clever new way for rule-consequentialists to avoid the incoherence objection. Hookers response def...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2016]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Jahr: 2016, Band: 19, Heft: 4, Seiten: 857-876 |
RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethik VA Philosophie |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Rule-utilitarianism
B Incoherence objection B Rule-consequentialism B Brad Hooker |
Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1565748654 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180731121829.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 171127s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-016-9687-8 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1565748654 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)49574865X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ49574865X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rajczi, Alex |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Rajczi, Alex | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism |c Alex Rajczi |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a For a long time many philosophers felt the incoherence objection was a decisive objection to rule-consequentialism, but that position has recently become less secure, because Brad Hooker has offered a clever new way for rule-consequentialists to avoid the incoherence objection. Hookers response defeats traditional forms of the incoherence objection, but this paper argues that another version of the problem remains. Several possible solutions fail. One other does not, but it introduces other problems into the theory. I conclude that the new incoherence objection still poses a major challenge to rule-consequentialism, though not for the reasons usually assumed. It does not constitute a fatal objection to rule-consequentialism but instead highlights a theoretical drawback in the theory which must be taken into account during a more holistic evaluation of rule-consequentialism and its rivals. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Brad Hooker | |
650 | 4 | |a Incoherence objection | |
650 | 4 | |a Rule-consequentialism | |
650 | 4 | |a Rule-utilitarianism | |
652 | |a NCA:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 19(2016), 4, Seite 857-876 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:857-876 |
856 | |u https://philarchive.org/rec/RAJOTI |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-016-9687-8 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9687-8 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 19 |j 2016 |e 4 |h 857-876 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2988311560 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1565748654 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20191104125826 | ||
LOK | |0 008 171127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |