Fact-Dependent Policy Disagreements and Political Legitimacy
Suppose we have a persistent disagreement about a particular set of policy options, not because of an underlying moral disagreement, or a mere conflict of interest, but rather because we disagree about a crucial non-normative factual assumption underlying the justification of the policy choices. The...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2017]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2017, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, Pages: 313-331 |
RelBib Classification: | NCD Political ethics VA Philosophy ZC Politics in general |
Further subjects: | B
Disagreement
B Legitimacy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1565736389 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20171127140135.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 171127s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-016-9770-1 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1565736389 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)495736384 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ495736384 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1134896441 |0 (DE-627)889772878 |0 (DE-576)489569420 |4 aut |a Kappel, Klemens |d 1964- | |
109 | |a Kappel, Klemens 1964- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fact-Dependent Policy Disagreements and Political Legitimacy |c Klemens Kappel |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Suppose we have a persistent disagreement about a particular set of policy options, not because of an underlying moral disagreement, or a mere conflict of interest, but rather because we disagree about a crucial non-normative factual assumption underlying the justification of the policy choices. The main question in the paper is what political legitimacy requires in such cases, or indeed whether there are defensible answers to that question. The problem of political legitimacy in fact-dependent policy disagreements has received almost no attention in political philosophy, which has focused mostly on value disagreements and proposed theories of legitimate coercive legislation in valuedependent disagreements. The paper presents an argument showing that under certain plausible assumptions regarding legitimacy, there are serious difficulties in identifying legitimate choices in fact-dependent policy disagreements. This may be unsurprising to political philosophers preoccupied with value-based disagreements, perhaps because it has been assumed that legitimacy-related concerns are irrelevant (or do not apply) to fact-dependent policy disagreements. The paper argues that this response is premature. If we should care about legitimacy et al.l, then it is by no means clear why we should ignore issues of legitimacy in policy-disputes that depend on factual disagreements. The paper ends by defining a set of possibilities that merit further exploration in search of a theory of legitimacy in fact-dependent policy disagreements. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Disagreement | |
650 | 4 | |a Legitimacy | |
652 | |a NCD:VA:ZC | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 20(2017), 2, Seite 313-331 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g pages:313-331 |
856 | |u https://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/185991252/Factual_disagreement_and_legitimacy.revOctober2016.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-016-9770-1 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9770-1 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 20 |j 2017 |e 2 |h 313-331 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2988289506 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1565736389 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20191104154800 | ||
LOK | |0 008 171127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736965 |a ZC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052856 |a NCD | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |